My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV103359
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV103359
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:14:11 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:05:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/1/2001
Doc Name
PHASE II BOND RELEASE APPLICATION SL-3
From
TRAPPER MINING INC
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
SL3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 1.2 Documentation of Successful Cropland Establishment <br />Trapper Mine reclaimed croplands in Ashmore, B~owning and Colt pits, as outlihed on-Map 1, were <br />sampled during 2001 to determine the success of cropland establishment. Crop production was the <br />parameter sampled. The purpose of the sampling was to evaluate the readirn:ss of reclaimed blocks for <br />Phase II bond release. <br />1.2.1 Methods <br />Cropland clip plot transects were randomly located on two cropland blocks and a reference area for <br />evaluation of Phase II bond release during 2001, as outlined on Map 1. Transect starting points were field <br />located using a G.P.S. satellite survey system in combination with large-scale topographic maps. Tran- <br />sects were 50 meters in length and run in a random direction from the starting point. All transects were <br />kept within reclaimed block or reference area boundaries. If the randomly selected transect direction <br />resulted in the possibility of the transect line crossing a boundary, the transect line was turned 180 <br />degrees to avoid crossing the boundary. <br />Three 0.5m2 clip plots were randomly located along each transect. Annual plant production was clipped <br />and separated into forb and grass life forms in each clip plot and placed in paper bags. Bags containing <br />clipped material were oven-dried at 30 degrees C for 48 hours and weighed to the nearest 0.1 g (with bag <br />weight subtracted out). Weights from the three clip plots were averaged to obtain a single production <br />value for each transect. <br />Reclaimed cropland blocks consisted of a logical grouping of reclaimed parcels lumped together for bond <br />release evaluation purposes. For this application, the two blocks were separrted on the basis of age of <br />reclamation. Block CR 82-92 will be sampled again during the summer of 2002 for Phase III bond release <br />purposes, while block CR 93-94 will not be included in the Phase III package because reclaimed parcels <br />within the block will not have completed the ten-year liability period by 2002. Sample adequacy (i.e. <br />number of transects required) was determined by block for Phase II bond release criteria using equations <br />specified by the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG). <br />1.2.2 Results and Discussion <br />Cropland production, as determined by randomly located clip plot transects, i:; summarized by reclaimed <br />block and compared against a reference area standard in Table 1.2-1. Table 1.2-1 indicates that the <br />Phase II production standard was achieved for both sampled blocks. <br />• Table 1.2-2 breaks out sampling results for individual transects at a plant life form production level. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.