My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV103132
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV103132
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:13:54 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:03:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/5/2000
Doc Name
PERMIT RENEWAL NO 3 ADEQUACY RESPONSE PN C-82-056
From
RAG TWENTYMILE COAL CO
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
RN3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III ~II~II~II~~II III <br />sss <br />000 <br />Twentymile Coal Company <br />February 4, 2000 <br />Janet Bunts <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />;ZECEIVED <br />FEB 0'7 2000' <br />RE: Permit Renewal No. 3, Adequacy Response <br />Permit No. C-82-056 <br />Dear Ms. Binns: <br />Division of Minerals 8 Geology <br />The following are TCC's responses to the concerns raised in the Division's letter of February 1, <br />2000. The item number requiring a response will be listed followed by TCC's response. <br />Item 1 -Page 3 has been corrected and the revised page is attached. TCC's acreage numbers <br />were used rather than the Division's due to the insignificant difference between the numbers. <br />Given that the Division's numbers were generated by digitizing Map 2 the differences are <br />reasonable, i.e. error associated with digitizing and paper stretch. <br />Item 21 -Page 2.05-179 has been revised by removing the typo referring to mining in 1887. A <br />copy of the revised page is attached. <br />Item 22a -Consultant has been contacted and TCC is awaiting receipt of the "As-Built". Once received it <br />will be forwarded to you. <br />Item 39 b) -The revised text on page 2.05.66 shows that the two sentences referenced in the Division's <br />letter were removed Gom the renewal materials. However, i[ was unclear that page 2.05116.1 was <br />eliminated from the materials and TCC is advising that this page be removed from the materials. <br />Therefore, it is clear that Map 24 does not imply that it presents topography. <br />Item 62 a) -The scale on the Pond Dotage/storage drawing submitted on January 25, 2000 is correct; <br />therefore, that drawing can be incorporated in the renewal application materials. The drawing was <br />checked in AutoCad 2000 to delennine if the scale was correct. <br />Item 62 d) - Pond E -Page 8 - 97 can be removed from the renewal materials and TCC has removed <br />reference to it in the Exhibit 8 table ofcontents. <br />Pond B -The certification is attached and can be inserted info Exhibit SF. <br />Pond D -The ccnification is attached and can be inserted into Exhibit 8H(1). It references both <br />Exhibits SH and 8H(1) in the certification. <br />Pond G -The certification is anached and can be inserted into Exhibit 8J. <br />29515 ROUT7 COUNTY ROAD #27, OAK CREEK, CO 80467 Phone: (970) 879-3800 Fax: (970) 979-8050 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.