My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV103106
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV103106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:13:53 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:03:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/31/1998
Doc Name
NEW HORIZON TR 36 REVEGETATION STANDARDS PN C-81-008
From
DMG
To
HARRY RANNEY
Type & Sequence
TR36
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:' • 's <br />3b. This concern was eliminated by the switch from success evaluation based on multiple <br />cuttings to evaluation based on trst cutting only. Justification is provided on amended <br />page 2.0~.4(2)(e)-16. <br />3c. The sample adequacy formula was appropriately amended. Other noted concerns were <br />eliminated by the switch from multiple cutting based evaluation to first cutting only. <br />4. Concerns satisfactorily addressed (for the same reasons noted in 3a, 3b, and 3c, above). <br />5. A one time sampling for dryland pasture areas is proposed in the amended plan, as <br />recommended by the Division. 'l'iming for the sampling was not addressed, nor were <br />provisions addressed for insuring that grazing does not interfere with data collection <br />during the years of bond release sampling. These items need to be addressed. The timing <br />of sampling is an important consideration for the dryland pasture, because the reclaimed _ _ . <br />areas aze dominated by cool season species, while the reference area has a significant <br />warm season component. It is suggested that sampling not be conducted prior to anthesis <br />of the dominant warm season grasses. <br />6. Text was properly amended. <br />The conflicting narrative regarding whether [he success standard is based on live <br />vegetation cover or total cover (live vegetation plus litter) has not been clarified. My <br />assumption is that the standard is based on live vegetation cover, as that is required by <br />regulation. The text needs to be appropriately amended. <br />Item satisfactorily addressed. <br />Issues from March 16 Memo <br />This item was not addressed in the amended plan. <br />2. This item was not addressed in the amended plan. <br />This item was not addressed in the amended plan. <br />A general comment I have is that the review of the amended plan would have been facilitated by <br />an item by item response to our adequacy comments. 1 am also curious regarding how old Mr. <br />Zene Weimer is. <br />cc: David Berry <br />m:lcoallh brlnltotr3 6 b. mem <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.