My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV102995
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV102995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:13:44 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:02:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/18/1992
Doc Name
TRAPPERS RESPONSE II TO DIV DRE 6/10/92
From
TRAPPER MINING INC
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
TR62
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
06/18/1992 3: 28:36PM HYDRO 307-266-6597 P1 =__ <br />FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET i <br />DATE: 6/18/92 TIME: 15:30 <br />NUMBER OF PAGES NOT INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 1 <br />ATTN: KENT GORHAM <br />FAX PHONE #: <br />FROM: <br />NAME: GEORGE L. HOFFMAN. HYDRO-ENGINEERING - <br />P"n~~E: 1-266-6597 <br />FAX PHONE: SAME AS ABOVE; CALL TO NOTIFY FIRST <br />June 18, 1992 <br />Kent Gorham <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />215 Centennial Bldg. <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 423 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Re: Response to Question D.4 <br />Dear Kent: <br />The following is our response to your question D.4 on the <br />Trapper Mine annual hydrologic report. Figures A-8 and A-36 of <br />Appendix A of the hydrology report present the hydrographs for the <br />Flume alluvial wells GC-3 and Coy. The upgradient alluvial well, <br />GC-3, showed a water level rise of a few feet in 1991 due to <br />recharge to this ground water system. lJater levels did not rise in <br />the Coy well in 1991 but the rate of decline of water levels in the <br />Coy well did reduce significantly. The alluvial system is much <br />smaller at well GC-3 and is therefore probably more sensitive to a <br />smaller amount of recharge than the larger cross sectional area at <br />the Coy well. A much larger quantity of water would be needed to <br />make the same water level rise at the Coy well as was observed at <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.