My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV102915
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV102915
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:13:37 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:01:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/22/1992
Doc Name
SENECA II MINE C-80-005 RN 02 ADEQUACY CONCERNS SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY
From
MLRD
To
SUSAN MORRISON
Type & Sequence
RN2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION aF ~o <br />~ <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />7373 Sherman St.. Room 275 Nr <br />` ~9$ <br />~ ~;~ , ~;, <br />Denver, CO 80203 .'~t„~„s' . <br />303 866-3567 Dais <br />Fnx 303 8328706 <br /> Roy Romer. <br /> Govemar <br />DATE: September 22, 1992 rn~chaa76. bong. <br /> Division D~rettor <br />TO: Susan Morrison <br />FROM: Stephen Wathe~~~ <br />RE: Seneca II Mine (C-80-005) <br />RN-o2: Adequacy Concerns: Surface Water Hydrology <br />I had the opportunity to briefly review the Seneca II Mine permit <br />application in conjunction with reviewing Seneca's 1991 Annual <br />Hydrology Report. My initial concerns are: <br />1. The operator needs to update the Probable Hydrologic <br />Consequences (PHC) section of the permit application. <br />Please have the operator update the PHC section of the <br />permit application. <br />2. I feel that we need a better method of tracking trends in <br />specific parameters over time. <br />Please consult with the operator concerning the need to <br />graph specific parameters for specific sites over time <br />These specific parameters are those that have shown <br />significant increases in value since 1981 or have <br />displayed possible exceedances of Colorado Department of <br />Health stream receiving standards. <br />This tracking should be included in the PHC section of <br />the permit application and in annual hydrology reports <br />until such information is not deemed any longer of <br />diagnostic value. <br />I have included a second memo (dated September 21, 1992) <br />outlining the parameters that I feel are most critically <br />in need of being graphed in order to better display their <br />trends over time. See also, memo dated September 23, <br />1992 on 1991 Annual Hydrology Report. <br />3. In the updated Probable Hydrologic Consequences section, <br />please have the operator explain continued increases in <br />specific parameters since 1981 and exceedances since <br />either 1981 or 1986; see # 4 below. <br />4. Operator might consider combining information in 1981 and <br />1986 PHC's into updated 1992 PHC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.