My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV102729
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV102729
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:13:24 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:58:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977193
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/3/1996
From
AZURITE INC
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />EXHIBIT E -- RECLAMATION PLAN <br />The reclamation plan will be presented in three basic sections, each which address certain site <br />aspects in order to attain the long range goals of reclamation including: <br />I) A geotechnically stable highwall configuration and surface grading plan which addresses the <br />control of stormwater flows, erosion potentials, and sediment controls which will operate in <br />perpetuity with low maintenance. <br />2) A site which will blend into neighboring land use as much as possible with final grading <br />features which will protect neighboring land areas by way of diversion and retention ~~f storm <br />flows away from the Tunnel Drive area and direct drainage into the Arkansas River. <br />3) A stable, self-sustaining, native vegetative mode, where appropriate, which will support <br />wildlife use and open graze use with a minimum of maintenance demand. <br />1) FINAL HIGHWALL DESIGN (typical cross section drawing included) <br />Compositional banding and zonal planes of migmatitic and metamorphic planes strike generally <br />North-South, dipping in a generally Eastern attitude at high angles (75 degrees or more). This <br />orientation has resulted numerous naturally occurring rock faces in the immediate area that <br />approximate a 0.25 : I slope. These natural faces are found to be in excess of SO feet in some <br />cases. Mining over the past twenty years in the granite area has shown that 0.25 : I slopes in this <br />material are stable. The 1985 amendment was approved with such a highwall design <br />parameters, but called for top soiling of the highwall benches and revegetation of the Benches <br />with trees, shrubs, and grasses. The current amendment proposal is to retain the approved bench <br />configuration design as originally proposed, but to forego the top soiling and revegetation <br />attempts for a number of reasons related to environmental impact. <br />a) The total area of highwall benches is a relatively small acreage vs the rest of the siU~. Low <br />moisture conditions, lack of irrigation potential for seedling installation, and low plant densities <br />over the site in general will result in a net environmental liability due to topsoil loss from the <br />mining benches prior to vegetative stabilization of the top soiled benches. The topsoil and <br />vegetative work will be much better utilized in the lower reaches of the mining area where <br />vegetative establishment is a more reasonable goal. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.