Laserfiche WebLink
Limited-Results Cultural Resource Survey Form (page 3 of 4) <br />V. LITERATURE REVIEW (continued) <br />25. Known Cultural Resources <br />In the project area: none <br />In the general region: one IF (SRT.997) <br />26. Expected Results: MAC expected few to no cultural resources for the project area as staked. Cultural <br />resources, if any, were expected to be prehistoric isolates or small lithic scatters. <br />VI. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES <br />27. Identify and assess any cultural resources within potential area of effect <br />VII. FIELD METHODS <br />28. Definitions: Site: five or more artifacts or a feature, structure or trail, or any combination of these <br />elements meeting OAHP criteria in a discrete location that is believed to represent the <br />locus of patterned human activity. - -- - - - - - - <br />IF: four or fewer artifacts without evidence of or potential for additional cultural <br />materials or features in the immediate vicinity. <br />29. Describe Survey Method: The surveyblock was covered bywalkingparallel pedestrian transects oriented <br />north-south that were no more than 20 meters apart. The proposed pad and ground bed centerlines were <br />mapped with a Trimble GPS unit, and data was post-processed to sub-meter accuracy. <br />VIII. RESULTS <br />30. List IFs, if applicable. Indicate IF locations on the map completed for Part III. <br />No cultural resources were discovered. <br />31. Using your professional knowledge of the region, why are there none or very limited cultural remains <br />in the project area? The project area is relatively small. Is there subsurface potential?: No. There <br />is little Holocene deposition in the project area. <br />