My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV102571
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV102571
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:13:14 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:56:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/1/2005
Doc Name
Block Biological Clearance Project
From
Oxbow Mining, LLC
To
DMG, BLM, Paonia Ranger District
Type & Sequence
TR53
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
One great-horned owl nest with two young was located in a Douglas-fir stand in the Elk <br />Creek drainage (Figure 1). The location of the nest indicated that it may have been built <br />by an accipiter a yeaz or more ago and the owl utilized the nest this yeaz. <br />Northern harrier's were observed in the area, but no young birds were observed during <br />the studies, which would indicate that nesting had occurred. There is suitable nesting <br />habitat in the azea for this species thus, there is a chance that nesting could occur. <br />BIG GAME <br />Elk, mule deer and black beaz are commonly found in the study azea. Elk and deer were <br />commonly observed in the study azea and there was evidence of considerable beaz <br />activity. There aze also suitable conditions in some of the azea for mountain lions. <br />Elk were observed during the May and eazly part of June studies in mountain shrub and <br />aspen habitat at upper elevations in the study azea. Cow elk and calves were observed in <br />the lazge aspen stands in June during the calving period. By the time studies were <br />completed most elk had moved on to higher elevations and were observed only <br />infrequently. Elk do winter along the faces above the North Fork, but winter use at <br />higher elevations in the study azea is very limited due to deep snow. Based upon <br />observations and other data much of the area where drilling activity is proposed is more <br />in transition range. <br />~ Mule deer were not observed in any significant numbers during the period of studies. <br />There were no specific azeas where most were observed. Most were observed later in the <br />' studies and in all habitat types. There is very little mule deer winter range in the study <br />azea and this is limited to lower elevations along the North Fork between Beaz and <br />Hubbazd Creeks. Some of this area also serves as transition range where deer remain in <br />the spring prior to moving up country. Drilling activity in this azea will be very limited. <br />Although none were observed, there was considerable evidence of black beaz activity <br />found throughout the study area. The black bear population in the North Fork Valley is <br />high and continues to grow. Development activities here and in other project areas have <br />not been a deterrent to their activities. <br />When evaluating potential effects on big game habitat use from proposed development <br />activities two things must be considered; (1) numbers of animals that might use the area <br />for winter or transition range and (2) total amount of habitat available. Based upon <br />observations made during these studies, elk and deer numbers aze low from spring <br />through fall. In the winter most animals will be found below where most development <br />activity will occur. Considering the amount of suitable habitat available throughout the <br />area from spring through fall transition periods there will be little affect on either deer or <br />elk activity. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.