Laserfiche WebLink
CDOH's choice of effluent standards at the site with any certainty, as they reserve the <br />right to review the site and potentially add parameters upon initiation of discharge. <br />It is not anticipated that treatment will be necessary. <br />3. Long-term dissolution beyond the quality observed in the thickener is considered to be <br />unlikely as current recycling of process water has resulted in water in the plant being <br />physically agitated with the raw coal multiple times and achieving a saturated <br />equilibrium with material moving through the plant. Samples of the thickener slurry <br />have provided snapshots of the quality of water projected within the mine, as <br />ultimately the mine will fulfill the role as the recycling impoundment that Pond 006 <br />serves. The projection of water quality within the flooded workings has already been <br />estimated on Table 26B. <br />The quality of the water in the mine is going to be at its worst condition when <br />pumping of thickener slurry is completed. After that point, inflows into the mine will <br />start to dilute the water. The discussion of column leach tests performed on New Elk <br />refuse on pages 2.05-63 through 2.05-78 characterizes the subsequent impact of <br />dilution through [he leaching analysis. The thickener solution appears to be a fair <br />match to the two columns in their intermediate period, being a saline, sodium sulfate <br />solution. <br />4. Table 26C includes only those parameters for which there is the potential to result in <br />the diminution of one beneficial use or another. The table has been expanded to <br />include four additional metals: lead, molybdenum, nickel, and selenium. Furthermore, <br />the text on page 2.05-88 has also been modified. <br />5. The Division appears to be expressing concern about potential degradation of surface <br />waters below material damage standards in the unlikely, worst case situation of the <br />mine discharging water from the portal. It is valuable to examine each situation on <br />a case-by-case basis to resolve the viability of each concern. <br />The alluvium typically is recharged by the associated river in the spring during high <br />flow conditions, and discharges to the stream in the fall and winter during low flow <br />conditions. The inverse relationship between salinity and flow has been documented <br />in the 1993 Annual Hydrology Report and in the Addendum to the PHC in Exhibit 6. <br />Basin provided a demonstration of loading of the slurry thickener solution on low flow <br />conditions in the river, when the river's conductivity was likely to be the highest, and <br />during the period when water is likely to be discharging from the alluvium into the <br />river, to assess impacts to the river itself, as this appeared to be the most vulnerable <br />period for the river. In the spring, flows are likely to be much higher than 4 cfs, <br />which will result in greater dilution of the slurry water. When this water recharges <br />the alluvium, there will be nominal diminution of water quality. <br />The loading exercise found on Table 26C showed the loading of total manganese. The <br />domestic standard is written against the dissolved standard, of which the highest <br />concentration observed in the slurry was 0.02 mg/I. This should no[ compromise any <br />