Laserfiche WebLink
• production during drilling of core hole 26-88-1. Notice that after placement of the packer in <br />the upper portion of the R6, essentially no waterwas produced until midway through the RS zone. <br />A[ the site of the proposed solution cavity tests, the groundwater level is approxima[ely <br />400 ft below the surface, with the dissolution surface some 32.8 ft above the top of the Boles <br />Bed. <br />The condition of the fluid during dissolution, the degree of saturation of the host medium, <br />and the fluid/rock conditions after abandonment are critical to operations and long-term stability. <br />The solution cavity will be developed using elevated temperature, partially saturated to saturated, <br />fluid circulated within the cavity. The fluid pressure during dissolution exceeds the in situ initial <br />fluid pressure and could tend to leak off. This leak-off is prevented by precipitation of sodium <br />bicarbonate in the flow paths as the pregnant fluid flows away from the solution cavity and <br />cools down. Following completion of production, the production holes will be sealed. The <br />fluid in the solution ca~riry will cool down, precipitate out some bicarbonate, and the remaining <br />fluid pressure could either remain equal to the shut-in pressure or subside to the pressure of the <br />overlying strata (approximately equal to the existing water table some 400 ft from the surface). <br />• During production by solution mining, the most probable scenario is that of saturated <br />1 undisturbed material below the dissolution surface and fluid pressure in a sealed cavity. The <br />~• least stable configuration is when the fluid pressure in the cavern is in equilibrium with the <br />overlying groundwater. This is possible after the cavity has been sealed. <br />Thermal Environment-The fluid introduced to develop the solution cavity will have a <br />temperature of approximately 200 degrees, thereby causing temperature changes and thermally <br />induced stresses in the host rock. In addition, elevated temperatures in the host rock could cause <br />some reduction in rock strength. Tesu by Dowell Schlumberger show a slight increase in <br />strength forcrystalline nahcolite at temperatures of 200'F. Oil shale strength generally decreases <br />with temperature. <br />3.2 MATERIAL PROPERTIES <br />Laboratory data is available from many sources foroil shales and nahcolite rock oil shales. <br />The previous analysis (JFTA, August, 1988) used properties available primarily from Multi <br />Minerals/IRI core holes, the USBM test mine at Horse Draw, and data from the Dowell <br />• Schlumberger repon. Since that time, core hole NaTec 26-88-1 was completed (JFTA, <br />December, 1988) and other site-specific data became available. <br />J. F. T. Agapito & Associates, Inc. 10 <br />r <br />