Laserfiche WebLink
inadequate reclamation warranty. Denying the amendment would create more administrative burden for <br />the Division and Applicant. <br />6. Centex has a duty to prepare and file each year with the Division an annual report describing activities <br />at [he mine, in accordance with § 34-32-116(3). This report, combined with Division inspections, will <br />ensure that Centex's plans remain consistent with this plan. <br />Since three years will pass before any mining is contemplated in the amended area in question, new <br />reclamation information must be submitted prior to posting the warranty in order that the Division may <br />reevaluate the warranty amount to ensure it is still sufficient to guazanty reclamation. <br />ORDER <br />Based on the above fmdings of fact and conclusions of ]aw, the Boazd orders that Applicant's deadline for <br />posting a financial warranty for its second amendment to Pemut File No. M-1984-041 is hereby extended to the <br />end of the calendar year, 2005. Petitioner shall submit updated reclamation cost estimates three months prior to <br />the time it seeks its amended pernrit. <br />DATED this ~'~ day of `C-~--~ , 2002. <br />FOR THE COLORADO MINED LAND RECLAMATION BOARD <br />Michael B. Lon Direc <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />