My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-03-04_REVISION - M1973007SG
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1973007
>
2005-03-04_REVISION - M1973007SG
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:33:20 PM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:46:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1973007SG
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/4/2005
Doc Name
Application
From
Continental Materials Corp.
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINING PLAN <br />in the final revegetation also growing on the soil stockpiles. This will build an additional seed bank in <br />the soil that can add to the success of the final revegetation. <br />Species Pounds/acre Pure Live Seed <br />Intermediate Wheatgrass 10 <br />Pubescent Wheatgrass 10 <br />Sand Bluestem or Sand Dropseed 10 (if Bluestem) OR 0.25 (if Dropseed) <br />Blue Grama 1 <br />TOTAL 31 (if Bluestem) OR 21.25 (if Dropseed) <br /> (BROADCAST SEEDING, ONLY) <br />OVERBURDENREMOVAL - Based on what was shown in drill logs, the distinction <br />between soil and overburden is expected to be rather vague in the area that was once reservoir. Further <br />to the west, in the existing mining area, there is usually a good distinction between soil and <br />overburden. There overburden is generally a very fine, slightly darker sand than the sand deposit <br />itself, but not as dark as the topsoils. Sometimes the overburden is of sufficient quality that it can be <br />considered marketable sand, but often that is not the case. <br />In the reservoir area it is likely that this original overburden has been heavily infiltrated with <br />fines from the soil above. Those fines were carried to greater depth by seepage from the reservoir into <br />the underlying sands. Although partial sealing of the reservoir bottom probably occun-ed fairly <br />quickly, some infiltration still occurred and that undoubtedly carried some fines into deeper layers of <br />the unconsolidated sand. <br />Unless there is a similar distinction between soil and overburden in the reservoir area, it is <br />likely that the overburden will be removed along with the soil. If infiltration of fines actually occurred <br />it is likely that what would normally be overburden and of limited value as a growth medium will <br />contain more fines and organic matter in the area of the reservoir. In that case the overburden itself, <br />when mixed with the overlying soils, would be a suitable growth medium and could be replaced as <br />such. <br />In the event an overburden layer is found that is not suitable as a growth medium (similar to <br />the overburden encountered further to the west) then that will be stockpiled separate from the soil and <br />replaced on the final surface prior to placement of the topsoil. <br />Daniels Sand Pit #2 -Little Johnson Amendment - M-is~s-oo~ Exhibit D Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.