My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV101475
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV101475
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:12:00 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:45:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977210
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/2/1988
Doc Name
RESPONSES TO MLRD COMMENTS ON 10-27-88
From
WEST INC
To
ROCKY MTN ASPHALT INC
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SURFACE WATER RESPONSES TO COl4~NTS BY CMI.RD <br />on Rocky Mountain Asphalt's Summit Pit Application <br />These responses are to comments made by C. M. Farrell, Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division (CMRD), Reclamation Specialist, <br />to Rob Mangone, General Manager of Rocky Mountain Asphalt, in a <br />memorandum dated October 27, 1988. <br />Desi n Storm Hydrology <br />Several of the comments relate to conveyance of the design storm <br />in the existing and constructed channels. The design storm <br />standard for channels is specified by CMLRD to be the 100-year, <br />24-hour storm event, No available stream gaging records were <br />located for Waldo Canyon or adjacent small watersheds from which <br />to perform a statistical analysis of the flood characteristics. <br />Therefore, a synthetic method of deriving the 100-year flood was <br />required to develop the design discharges. <br />Several methods were evaluated to calculate the 100-year .- <br />discharges. The most straigt~Arrward method is referred ~to as <br />the Colorado Tehnical Manual 'f--rhethod, prepared by the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board (1976). This procedure is a regression <br />type method based upon watershed and precipitation <br />characteristics for natural-flow streams in Colorado. Waldo <br />Canyon and the East tributary are certainly natural-flow streams; <br />however, two limitations of the procedure prevented its <br />application to the area: 1) Waldo Canyon is eight times smaller <br />than the smallest basin used to develop the regression <br />relationship; 2) Waldo Canyon is at an elevation that makes both <br />the Plains region and the Mountain region procedures appropriate. <br />Both relationships were applied but the difference between the <br />two procedures was a factor of 100. This large variation <br />prevented any meaningful averaging of the procedures. <br />The procedure that ~~~ ~~.~..~~ to eotoite the design discharged <br />was the HEC1 computerised flood hpdrograph package developed by <br />the US Army Corps olr:.$giaeers (1985). This procedure has the <br />advantages that: 1) it is a widely used and accepted hydrologic <br />tool; 2) it incorporates multiple watershed charateristics that <br />allow the simulation of all types and sizes of watersheds; and <br />3) HEC1 produces complete hydrographs, not just peak flow rates <br />as does Technical Manual 1. <br />Basin characteristics were measured for the hydrologic <br />simulation. The watershed boundaries for Waldo Canyon and the <br />East tributary are shown in figure Exhibit B (figures are labeled <br />according to the appropriate CMLRD permit application exhibit). <br />The measured watershed characteristics are listed in Table 1. <br />The topographic relief map of Exhibit B shows the steep slopes of <br />Surface Water Responses: Summit Pit Application paq• 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.