My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV101377
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV101377
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:11:54 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:44:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
COAL LEASE MODIFICATION COC 53510
Type & Sequence
TR37
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Act of 1920, Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act of 1976, and 43 CFR 3400. Specifically, the BLM has reviewed <br />the coal lease modification application in accordance with applicable regulatory provisions of 43 CFR 3432, Lease <br />Modifications. Consistent with these provisions, the proposed lease modification would serve the interests of the <br />United Stales. [hire is no competitive interest in these reserves, and the reserves could not be developed as part of <br />another potential or existing independent operation. In addition, the proposed modification area is less than the 160 <br />acre limit under 43 CFR §3432 and less than the area of 1,339.56 acres covered by the existing lease, and no prior <br />modifications of this lease have occurred nor are there any other lease modification applications pending for this lease. <br />The United States would receive fair market value for the coal contained in the modification area. <br />The BLM has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) to evaluate potential impacts of the proposed lease <br />modification on the environment and to develop mitigating measures to be included as lease stipulations as appropriate <br />to prevent, control, or adequately mitigate identified potential impacts. In order to make a preliminary determination <br />of whether the proposed coal lease modification and potential associated environmental impacts should be evaluated <br />under an EA or the more extensive and rigorous Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process, [he BLM considered <br />a number of factors. These factors included; 1) The proposed action would occur as a modification of an existing lease <br />and, as proposed, is consistent with the applicable provisions of 43 CFR 3132; 2) The need for a timely determination <br />on the lease modification application in order to avoid bypass of the subject coal reserves as ongoine mining operations <br />progress to the west; and 3) Potential [elated environmental impacts are similar to those previously evaluated for the <br />existing coal lease and the incremental impacts associated with the proposed modification, when considered <br />cumulatively with other leasing and related actions, are not significant. <br />The BLM must also evaluate lease proposals with respect to the coal unsuitability criteria developed by the Department <br />of the Interior in compliance with Section 522 of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMRCA) <br />and 43 CFR 3461, Federal Lands Review -Unsuitability for Mining. The coal unsuitability criteria was applied to <br />the modification area. Appendix A, Unsuitability Analysis and Report, summarizes, for each of the regulatory <br />unsuitability criteria, considerations and applicability relative to the proposed coal lease modification. Any specific <br />stipulations resulting from application of the unsuitability criteria aze included in the discussion of mitigation measures <br />for this EA. <br />Following completion of the final EA, the BLM -Uncompahgre Field Manager will forward the EA, the Finding of <br />No Significant Impact (FONSl). Record of Decision (ROD), and Maximum Economic Recovery Report (MER) to the <br />BLM Colorado State Director in Denver. If the State Director determines that the EA is adequate and that a FONSI <br />isjustified, she will concur with [he ROD. The requirements for reclamation bonding aze reviewed and approved and <br />the applicant must post the required bond before the lease can be issued. <br />The information Oxbow submitted in the coal lease modification application and the environmental evaluation <br />provided in this document do no[ constitute or substitute for a formal underground mining permit application. The <br />application information has been used in order to develop this EA impact analysis for development of the federal coal <br />reserves contained in the proposed lease modification area and the general limitations and mitigation measures <br />necessary to address overall impacts. Applicable terms and conditions under Coal Lease COC-53510 (refer to <br />Appendix B, Coal Lease COC-53510 -Terms and Conditions) would also apply to this modification, as well as any <br />specific Terms and Conditions attached to the approval of the modification. Detailed mining and reclamation plans <br />complying with all applicable federal and state regulations and provisions must be submitted and approved before <br />mining operations can proceed under the lease modification. <br />The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA) gives OSM primary responsibility for <br />administration of programs regulating surface coal mining operations on federal lands and the surface effects of <br />underground coal mining operations on federal lands. Pursuant to Section 503 of SMCRA, the Colorado Division of <br />Minerals and Geology (CDMG) developed, and the Secretary of the Interior approved, a permanent program <br />authorizing CDMG to regulate surface coal mining operations and surface effects of underground coal mining on non- <br />-~- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.