My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV101313
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV101313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:11:50 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:44:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981025
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/22/2002
Doc Name
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE OF MR 20 RECLAMATION RECAPITULATION
From
DMG
To
FILE C-81-025 MR-20
Type & Sequence
MR20
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C-81-025 MR 20 <br />April 5, 2002 <br />Page 3 of4 <br />below for the criteria for this determination. <br />z Not applicable to a determination of completeness. <br />*Rule 2.08.4(3) See the Rules for the text of this rule. <br />The proposed action was determined to be appropriate to a minor revision [Rule 1.04(73)]. <br />*Rule 2.08.4(5) Application r•eyuirentents. An application for all types of revisions or a perrni[ <br />shall contain: <br />*Rule 2.08.4(5)(a) An iden[ification of the permit by permit number or other appropriate reference <br />which is the subject of the revision; <br />The application is incompliance with this rule. A cover sheet to the application correctly identifies <br />the permit as C-81-025. <br />*Rule 2.08.4(5)(b) A specific description of the requested change in the terms of the permit; <br />The application is in compliance with this rule. Revised pages to the permit provide a description <br />of the requested changes in the terms of the permit. <br />*Rule 2.08.4(5)(c) A specifc description of any changes in the mining and reclamation opera ion <br />which may !rave an effect on performance bond reytrirements of Rule 3; and <br />The application is in compliance with this rule. There is no effect on the performance bond <br />requirements. The cover sheet of the application indicates no change. <br />*Rule 2.08.4(5)(d) Such other information as may be necessary for the Division to determine if the <br />proposed revision will cornply with the Act and these Rtrles. The Board or Division may reasonably <br />request addi[ionnl information [o evaluate the proposed revision. <br />The application is in compliance with this rule. Information in the application is complete. <br />Rule 2.08.4(6)(c)(iii) Within /0 days after the notification required by 2.08.4(S)(c)(ii) above, any <br />person which has an interest which is or may be adversely affected may request a formal hearing <br />on the decision by the Division. Such request shall be in writing and state with reasonable <br />specificity [he reasons for the request and objections to the Division. If so requested, the formal <br />hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of 2.07.4(3). <br />The public notice was posted on March 22, 2002. There were no public comments on the <br />proposed revision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.