My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-12-16_REVISION - M1977208 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977208
>
2004-12-16_REVISION - M1977208 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:23:46 PM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:44:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977208
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/16/2004
Doc Name
Review- CKD Disposal in C Pit
From
DMG-hhp
To
DMG-esc
Type & Sequence
TR5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman S[., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />Date: December 16, 2004 <br />To: Erica Crosby <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION O F <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />REC LAMATION•M~NING <br />SAFETY•SOIENCE <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Russell George <br />Executive Director <br />~ ~ ~j Ronald W. Cattany <br />From: Harry POSey ~~/Jf 1.,•I/~ Division Director <br />„~~ ~ V Natural Resource Trustee <br />Subject: Review of TR-5, CKD Disposal ~ C-Pit; Cemex Inc; Lyons Quany <br />M-1977-208 / <br />To abate a high pH problem in C-Pit at the Lyons Quarry, Cemex has proposed a water treatment plan in <br />case pumping water from the pit is insufficient to alleviate the potential risk to wildlife. Following are a <br />few comments related to their proposal. <br />1. The introductory paragraph of the URS report correctly recalls that a prior report indicated there is <br />no risk to groundwater. However, the Division has asked for proof of that lack of risk in the form <br />of a monitoring well drilled into the Dakota Sandstone. Nothing in the Operator's citation will be <br />construed to change the Division's position on the need for a deep monitoring well into the first <br />aquifer below the site. <br />2. The proposal under TR-26 has two sections: a cover letter that explains the proposal, and a URS <br />Corporation "Water Treatment Plan" report attached. Explanations of the Plan in these two <br />documents are slightly discrepant. <br />The letter says the pit will be pumped down to the "smallest practical size;" that level, which <br />apparently is to be 4 feet water depth, will be determined by "pump limitations," and the <br />remaining pond surface area after pumping "will be significantly smaller than the approximate 7 <br />acres that the [pond] currently covers." After pumping to a 4 foot level - or thereabouts, <br />presumably -water from A-pit will be used in place of the C-Pit water. After pumping to the <br />"smallest practical size the water quality of the water remaining in the pit will be analyzed and <br />compared to the applicable standards..." through consecutive sampling events and, if standards <br />are met, "the source will be deemed to have been removed." The letter also indicates that <br />adjustments maybe made to promote pumping even more water from C-pit. <br />The attached URS report states, however, that "[i]n the event that CEMEX is not able to use all of <br />the water ponded in the C-Pit, a contingent water treatment plan is provided in this document to <br />treat the ponded C-Pit water." Thus the two documents are not in agreement over whether water <br />will be treated or not. <br />To clear up this discrepancy, the Division will accept that C-Pit will pumped to within <br />approximately 4 feet of the base of the pit in the vicinity the pump, and that adjustments may or <br />Office of Office of Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Active and Inactive Mines Geological Survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.