My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV100762
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV100762
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:11:15 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:38:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/16/2000
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO 3-14-2000 CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE MINING
From
DMG
To
GREG WALCHER
Type & Sequence
TR26
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A9E~LI0 [o Greg Walcher <br />1 ~4larch 16, 2000~Response to AI[tance (or Responsible [Yfining <br />Page 2 <br />Response to Item 2 <br />Our understanding of EPA's Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) is that it does not give a <br />realistic estimate of the potential for impacts to human health or the environment. For <br />example, for toxics to have impact, there must be a pathway for the substance to get <br />from the place of origin to the target. In the case of mining, most of the inventoried <br />toxics are either locked in the mineral matrix and/or are so isolated that there is no <br />reasonable or likely potential for detrimental impacts to human health or the <br />environment. <br />Secondly, regulated mining operations are required to meet state and federal <br />standards for all releases to the environment. If they violate standards, they are <br />subject to various combinations of civil and criminal penalties. If mining operators are <br />permitted to release toxic substances to the environment, provided that permit <br />standards are not violated, then we fail to see the significance of the Toxic Release <br />Inventory. <br />Response to Item 4: <br />The Alliance seems to be concerned that if the Cripgle Creek and Victor Gold Mining <br />Company's (CC&V) proposed permit modification is approved, the mine may be in <br />operation for decades. The operation has had a history of compliance with its MLRB <br />permit. The site is monitored monthly by DMG. So, as long as there are adequate <br />regulatory programs to monitor site activities and an adequate reclamation bond is in <br />place, the risk is low. For example, we know of no instances in the Unlted States of <br />death or injury to private citizens due to these types of mining operations. This does <br />not mean that this Division takes proposed changes in CC&V's operation lightly. Each <br />permit application or modification to the existing permit receives intense scrutiny and <br />review before it is approved. <br />cc: Ron Cattany <br />m: \ oss \ gaw \ al liance <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.