Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiiiiiiiiiuii~ <br />999 <br />~ STATE <br />COLOI~DO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmem of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St_ Room 215 <br />Dern-er, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (3031 856-3561 <br />FAX: (307) 832-8106 <br />November 30, 2000 <br />Warren Wilcox <br />Gunnison Gravel <br />P.O. Box 42 <br />Gunnison, CO 81230 <br />~ECE~VEr~ <br />~~~ ~ 4 ~='~.l <br />IIIY%SI <br />e~O~Miner; ~. <br />~T1: - <br />L'~~~i .~..,~ -. .. '. b ..~, ~ ~~ <br />~~~~~.1. ~~Ig}3 ~~ a. <br />t:UUt,A~PX~, i 4 w Get/ -p <br />~~ <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />R E C L A M A T I O N <br />MI NING•SA FETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Goremar <br />Ciep E wakher <br />Eveculrve D~reuor <br />Alic hael B. long <br />Divicron Direcmr <br />Re: Dickerson Pit, Permit M-1978-305, Conversion Application CN-01, Fourth Adequacy Review Letter. <br />Dear Mr. Wilcox, <br />I have reviewed the materials submitted by you toward satisfying the adequacy requirements of the above-named <br />application. There have been several submittals from you since my IasC review letter, all of which have been taken <br />into account in this review letter. Many of the outstanding adequacy items have been addressed, though there are <br />still some questions. 1 have included those questions so that you may respond to them, and have included some <br />comments which do not require any response. Please understand that your responses are important for ensuring <br />that areas of monitoring are clarified, that physical parameters and disturbances are quantified, and that the best <br />representative bond amount may be calculated. As usual, I have listed these items in the order of the exhibit to <br />which they pertain. Please artange your responses in similar order. <br />Exhibit C - Minin¢ Plan Map <br />Your proposed mining plan was recently revised to mine in two phases, with the mining plans being dramatically <br />different for the two phases. When you submitted this recent proposed revision, you did not include a Phase I <br />mining plan map, to accompany the narrative. I will again request that you submit a revised map, which adequately <br />depicts all aspects of the revision involving Phase I operations, as listed below. <br />Your recent submittal includes a copy of a fared snap showing a few details of the approximately hvo new acres of <br />Phase [, but the map does not suffice for this exhibit. Please review Rule 6.4.3, and provide a Phase I mining map <br />including all required information. Also, please ensure that this map is not derived from a faxed copy, since faxing <br />is known to distort map dimensions. Details should include roads, slopes, stockpile areas for product and topsail, <br />direction of mining, floor configuration, drainage patterns, cultural resource area, and map scale or boundary <br />measurements. <br />All previous submittals of mining plan maps are adequate for depicting the Phase II plan. <br />E.ehibit D - Minine Plan <br />Your last submittal clearly states that Phase I will consist of operating in the existing area and in an additional hvo <br />acres (+/-) to be mined similarly to the existing 1 10 permit area. All operations beyond that area should be <br />considered Phase Il, and may include additional impacts to the Phase 1 area. Phase II is recognized to be the <br />original plan. <br />Will any final reclamation activities occur during the operating of Phase I, before i[ is known whether Phase I1 will <br />be approved'? <br />