My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV100449
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV100449
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:10:56 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:36:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/1/2000
Doc Name
PN C-81-022 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TR 32 DECISION DATE
From
OXBOW MINING INC
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR32
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Dep. rlmenl of Natural Resourceo <br />1313 Shermen SL, Room 215 <br />Denver, Coloracb 80203 <br />Phone: (3031 866-7561 <br />FAX: 1303)83?-b106 <br />~~ <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAf ETY <br />BSI I Owens <br />Governor <br />INTERNAL MEMO Greg E Watcher <br />Ececulne Dveclor <br />Michael B. Lang <br />Diaision Director <br />TO: Joe Dudash, Sandy Brown, Larry Routten l4 Feb 2000 <br />~~ <br />FROM: Jim Burnell <br />SUBJ: Sanborn Creek Monitoring <br />I visited the staff at Sanborn Creek last Thursday (10 February 2000) to discuss the installation <br />of a monitoring well as part of their TR-32 work on Elk Creek Canyon. <br />By way of review, the operator proposed to add facilities in the canyon of Elk Creek, upstream <br />of the main mine facilities. My comments on the revision were that they really needed to <br />establish groundwater monitoring both up-gradient and down-gradient of the proposed facilities. <br />The response was that (I) Oxbow is already monitoring up-gradient of the proposed portal <br />facilities and (2) there is no undisturbed ground down-gradient of those facilities in which to site <br />a well. <br />I met with Kathy Welt, Mark Milner and Tom Anderson of the Oxbow staff to discuss the issue <br />First I reminded them of why we (the Division) have to see monitoring data. They accepted this <br />explanation. We viewed maps detailing the facilities at the mine and in the vicinity of the <br />canyon and discussed my opinion of both an "ideal" location for the down-gradient well and a <br />feasible, workable location. <br />We then traveled up the canyon, looked at existing facilities and development, discussed <br />disturbance of the area through the years, reviewed the plans for new construction in the canyon <br />and looked at possible sites. <br />Siting a monitoring well is a delicate issue. The canyon is quite narrow down-hill (down- <br />gradient and downstream) from the proposed portals and the imposition of the new facilities will <br />not only leave little room for ameaningfully-sited well after construction, but makes the <br />maintenance of a functioning well very difficult during construction. The location I think would <br />be ideal will be [he center of construction activity -moving of the existing road and developing a <br />topsoil pile, a conveyer, and a sediment pond. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.