My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV100304
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV100304
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:10:47 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:35:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1979192
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/1/2000
Doc Name
PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW FN M-79-192 SPOTTED BURRO PIT CONVERSION
From
DMG
To
PETE LIEN & SONS INC DBA TRANS COLORADO CONCRETE
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~I I I I~ ~ II I II I~~~ II~ • <br />999 <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303)866-3567 <br />FAX. p031 8328106 <br />Mav I, 2000 <br />Pete Lien & Sons, Inc dba Trans-Colorado Concrete <br />Attn: Lecia Craft- Environmental Engineer <br />P.O. Box 440 <br />Rapid City, SD X7709-0440 <br />RE: Preliminary Adequacy Review; File No. M-79-192; Spotted Burro Pit Conversion <br />Dear Ms. Crafr: <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />B,I I O..~e~s <br />eovermr <br />Greg E. bVa kher <br />E ~ecume Direuor <br />evchaelB Long <br />Dn-s,on Dueclor <br />The Division has completed its initial adequacy review for your 1 12 Construction Materials <br />Reclamation Permit Application. The application was received on October 12, 1999 and called <br />complete for technical review on February 9, 2000. The decision date for your application is <br />May 9, 2000. Please be advised that if you are unable to satisfactorily address any concerns <br />identified in this review before the decision date, it will be your responsibility to request an <br />extension of the review period. If there are outstanding issues that have not been adequately <br />addressed before the end of the review period, and no extension has been requested, the Division <br />will deny this application. <br />The review consisted of comparing the submitted information with the specific requirements of <br />Rule 6.4 and 6.5 of the Minerals Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board for the Extraction of Construction Materials. Any inadequacies aze identified <br />under the respective exhibit heading along with suggested actions to correct these inadequacies. <br />6.4.1 EXHIBIT A- Legal Description <br />This section is adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.2 EXHIBIT B- Index Mao <br />This section is adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.3 EXHIBIT C-Pre-mining and Mining Plan Maps of Affected Lands <br />The maps are adequate as submitted with a couple of exceptions. Whether or not any revisions <br />are required will depend on how the mining plan inadequacies are addressed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.