My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV99944
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV99944
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:23:45 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:32:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/12/2007
Doc Name
Review of Adequacy Submittals Memo
From
DRMS Grand Junction
To
Jim Stark
Type & Sequence
PR2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />7313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />M[NING <br />- &- <br />SAFETY <br /> Bill Ritter, Jr. <br /> Governor <br /> INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Harris D. Sherman <br /> Executive DireROr <br /> Ronald W. Cattany <br /> Division Director <br /> Natural Resource Trustee <br />DATE: March 12, 2007 <br />TO: Jim Stark <br />FROM: Dan Mathews <br />RE: Review of Adequacy Submittals, PR-02 Colowyo Mine (Permit No. C-81-019) <br />Below are my itemized review comments pursuant to Colowyo's two separate responses <br />to our preliminary adequacy letter for PR-02. I did not reiterate the original adequacy <br />comments or Colowyo's full responses here, I just provided my review comment based on the <br />operator response and associated amended materials. I tried to write the comments so that they <br />can be directly inserted into an adequacy letter. <br />I'll be forwarding a copy of this directly to Tay, unless you have any objections, and I am <br />scheduled to meet with Tay and his crew on Friday, the 16`h, at the Walsh offices here itt Grand <br />Junction. Let me know if you have any questions, and consider yourself invited to the meeting on <br />Friday. <br />Rule 2.04.6 Geology Description <br />10. Operator's response referenced the overburden handling plan and regraded spoil <br />monitoring plan on p. 2.05-8 of the current permit, and stated their contention that blending <br />prior to final placement will be adequate to ensure suitable surface spoil. Response <br />included amendments to delete Saturation % as a suitability criterion, and withdrawal of <br />Table 2.04.6-2 parameter suspect levels, to be replaced with reference to parameter list and <br />suitability criteria on p. 2.05-8 of current permit. <br />The Division questions whether overburden From the upper 50 foot zone will continue to <br />be placed as the surface spoil layer under the South Taylor plan, on both fills and pit <br />backfill areas unless special provisions aze made with respect to stockpiling the weathered <br />upper material separately from the deeper overburden zones. Technical justification has <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver ~ Grand JUnCtIOn Durango Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.