Laserfiche WebLink
DG°i~ <br />~I~ <br />5~ <br />~ Sorption is treated as linear equilibrium partitioning between aqueous and <br />solid phases; <br />• Transport of a single solute species for a given simulation is adequate. <br />Interactions between species are not considered. <br />7.3.3 Data Sources <br />• MYGRT only simulates groundwater flow and solute transport in the <br />saturated zone; unsaturated (vadose) zone transport is not considered; <br />• The groundwater seepage velocity remains constant over the distance of <br />a given simulation; <br />• Dispersion is represented by Fick's Law. The coefficients remain constant <br />for a given simulation; <br />The shortest distance to the property line was chosen as a conservative <br />~~ ~(~ assumption. The geologic units between the C-Pit and the hypothetical receptor <br />~u ~ ,(Gr" ~ wells were assumed to be saturated and to exhibit uniform porous medium <br />.S ,characteristics. <br />The aquifer parameters used in MYGRT are summarized in Table 7.2. Solute <br />transport simulations to the alluvium were conducted using a hydraulic <br />conductivity value of 2,000 feet per year for the weathered Niobrara Formation. <br />This value was determined by packer tests conducted in the Niobrara Formation <br />as part of an evaluation of the water storage potential of the A and C-Pits (Rocky <br />Mountain Consultants, 1988). The hydraulic conductivity of the Dakota <br />Sandstone was also assumed to be about 2,000 feet per year. A range of <br />reasonable hydraulic gradients, 0.1, 0.05, and 0.01, were used in the simulations <br />since the hydraulic gradient at the site is not known.. These values are typical of <br />similar hydrogeologic systems. Longitudinal and transverse dispersion <br />coefficients were estimated using an approach suggested by Gelhar and others <br />(1985). The downgradient flow direction was assumed to be due east towards <br />the St. Vrain Creek. The effective porosity for the weathered Niobrara and the <br />Dakota Sandstone was assumed to be 0.25. This value is considered typical of <br />weathered soils and sandstone units. <br />The hypothetical leachate release flux rate for the alluvium transport simulation <br />was estimated to be about 0.07 feet per year. The leachate flux rate was <br />estimated using the HELP model described in Section 7.2. A leachate flux rate of <br />0.03 feet per year was estimated for the Dakota Sandstone transport simulation. <br />The leachate flux rate used in the Dakota Sandstone simulation is about 100 <br />times higher than the leachate flux rate (0.0004 feet per year) calculated by the <br />HELP model because it is the lowest value that can be simulated using MYGRT. <br />17 <br />