My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV99574
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV99574
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:23:26 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:28:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977344
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/3/1986
Doc Name
CHARACTERIZATION OF US CEMENT KILN DUST
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Cement kiln dust (CKD) is a waste <br />product that accumulates ac the rate of <br />4 to 12 million tons per year in the <br />United Slates (2, 4)3. This duet has <br />considerable resource potential: It is <br />already being used as a neutralizer for <br />coal mine waste effluents, and the agri- <br />cultural and construction industries are <br />beginning to use it more extensively as <br />a substitute for lime. In the proposed <br />hazardous waste guidelines of 1978 (4) <br />promulgated under the Resource Conserva- <br />tion and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 <br />(I1), the Environmental Protection <br />Agency (EPA) placed CKD in a "Special <br />Wastes" category pending more informa- <br />tion on Che composition, characterist- <br />ics, and degree of hazard posed by this <br />waste. In 1980 the "Special Wastes" <br />category was removed (5), but a 3-year <br />EPA study of the hazard potential of <br />CKD was approved by Congress (10). Part <br />of the concern over the environmental <br />effects of waste CKD resulted from a <br />single study of the heavy metals content <br />of a CKD sample from BLaubeuren, West <br />Germany, showing lead and zinc contents <br />of 5,620 and 16,200 ug/g, respec- <br />tively (3). The only other analysis of <br />CKD for heavy metals used in the EPA <br />study was sample from Polk County, Ga., <br />showing 124 ug/g for lead and 145 <br />ug/g for zinc (12). A contracted <br />EPA study of the received in 1-gallon <br />cans and prepared cement industry con- <br />cluded that: <br />Waste kiln dust is probably the most <br />serious pollution control problem <br />facing the cement industry at this <br />time. Relatively little is known <br />about the dust, so environmentally <br />adequate management techniques are <br />difficult to specify (2). <br />An exploratory evaluation of the <br />environmental effects and of Che re- <br />source recovery potential of the ele- <br />ments present in CKD was initiated at <br />Che Bureau of Mines Avondale (Md.) Re- <br />search Center shortly after publication <br />of the 1978 EPA guidelines. Results of <br />the First phase of this research (8), <br />discussed major, minor, and trace ele- <br />ment concentrations, mineralogy, anion <br />composition, chemically bound water, <br />C02, and EP toxicity leach test re- <br />sults. The present report gives char- <br />acterization data for the U.S. cement <br />industry nationwide. Information on <br />noncarbonate carbon has been added For <br />all samples, as have mercury determina- <br />tions on selected samples, and signifi- <br />cant interelement correlation coeffici- <br />ents Eor the major, minor, and trace <br />elements. <br />SAMPLES <br />Samples of CKD were requested from <br />operating plants located in the contigu- <br />ous United States and Hawaii; 113 <br />samples from 102 plants, representing <br />about 70 percent of the total U.S. <br />cement industry, were received and ana- <br />lyzed. The remaining plants either did <br />not respond to the inquiry or had no <br />disposal problems because all their <br />waste dual was recycled. Table 1 lists <br />the States and the number of samples <br />received from each State. Samples were <br />received in 1-gallon cans and prepared <br />for analysis by the Following proce- <br />dure: <br />1. The sample as received vas <br />blended in a twin-shell blender for 30 <br />minutes, then riffle-split into two <br />portions. <br />2. One half of the sample was <br />labeled and stored, and the other half <br />was passed through a 100-mesh sieve. <br />Any portion of the sample coarser than <br />minus 100 mesh was ground in a Wiley <br />mi114 to pass 100 mesh. <br />3Underlined numbers in parentheses refer <br />[o items in the list of references at <br />[he end of this report. <br />Reference to specific brand names is <br />made for identification only and does not <br />imply endorsement by the Bureau of Mines. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.