My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV99573
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV99573
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:23:26 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:28:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977219
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/5/1995
From
AP GREEN
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Mr. Schreiner -2- May 2, 1995 <br />As for demolition and removal of the crusher and screening <br />plant, one crane at $640/day and two welders at $190/day <br />each would be required for three (3) days. A lowboy trailer <br />would be required to haul the equipment to a disposal site, <br />assumed to be Pueblo. The transport cost would be $1,000. <br />Total removal cost would, therefore, be $2,730/day for 3 <br />days plus $1,000 for a total of $9,190. <br />4. The $2.00/cu.yd. cost includes the cost of drilling and <br />blasting. This is based on the fact that the sandstone and <br />shale overburden is relatively soft. Blasting would cast <br />much of the top of the highwall do:anward to the toe of the <br />slope. The blasting would thus minimize the quantity and <br />distance of overburden required for dozing. <br />5. I did not receive the referenced correspondence from the <br />State Engineer and Division of Wildlife. <br />Sincerely, <br />Charles E. Stack <br />Manager, Mining & <br />Raw Material Operations <br />cc: L. Weir <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.