My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV99386
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV99386
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:23:17 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:26:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1994117
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/9/1998
Doc Name
FAX COVER
From
MCCULLEY FRICK & GILMAN INC
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT-OA-AB 02:15PL1 FROM-McCULLEYFRICKiGILIIAN <br />3034471836 T-OIA P.03/15 F-154 <br />CASH MINE /GOLD HILL MILL <br />COLD HILL, COLORADO <br />TAILINGS IMPOUNAMENT EXPANSION <br />TECHNICAL IZEV1S10N <br />A. EMBANKMENT STABU.ITY AND LINER FOUNDATION <br />The original design for the expansion of the tatlmgs impoundment at the Gold Hill Mill includes a <br />13-foot mtse of the embattkmen[, based on a modified upstream construction technique. The footprint of <br />the embatdmtent rarse extettds approxunauly 40 feet out from the upstream face of the ongina] embankrttent <br />onto the staface of the existing tarltngs. Approximately 20 to 25 feet of the extsring tttiltngs remnm exposed <br />beyond the upstream ice of the embartlmtrnt terse. A biaxial geognd was installed on the surface of the <br />existing tatlmgs, within the footprint of the cmbarikmrnt rarse, prior to construction of the new embatilanent, <br />to facilitate placcmrnt of the mtnal fill layers. The geogrid was not specifically designed as a rcinforcmg <br />member in the embatrkmrn[ mtse, al[hough some reinforcement benefit is realized. <br />The stabtliry of the raised embattlement was analyzed as part of the desrgn for the new facility. The <br />rotational failure potential of the upstream and downstream slopes of the factltry was evaluated at venous <br />stages of filling of the impoundment. The soil parameters used in the computer model analyses were based, <br />in pan, on results of laboratory analyses of representative soil and tailings samples collected from the sere <br />and, in part, on conservative estimates from published hteranirc and previous experience with similar <br />matrnals. All of the stabthry analyses mdtcated factor of safety greats than the minimum acceptable <br />values. The indicated govettung cotidltton was determrncd to be the post~onstructton condition, with <br />saturated tatlmgs as the foundation for the embankment raise and no bunressing by newly placed tatlmgs. <br />Mtnunum calculated factors of safety were 13 for static condtttons and 1.14 for pseudo static (sersmic) <br />conditions. Throughout the analyses, it was assumed that the existing tailings would be lefr tit place. <br />It was subsequently proposed that a portion of the exposed saturated tailings upstream of the <br />embankment raise be removed to unprove foundation conditions below the new liner system for the <br />expanded impoundmrnt. Observation of the embanlo=tent rarse following completion of construction has <br />revealed no evidence of distress that would indicate potential instability of the foundation. However, <br />initiation of mechanical removal of the exposed tarlmgs and established vegetation in two azeas of the <br />existing unpoundmrnt gave rise to concerns the[ such removal may compromise the stability of the <br />embankment through removal of the existing materials that aze providing passive resistance against <br />movemrnt of the foundation tailings under the embankment raise. Analysis of possible block failure <br />mechanisms to the embattktnen[ and foundation tailings was condttcted using the soil property and soiUlincr <br />interface fricaon value employed in nc~ original stabiltry analyses. This analysts of possible block failure <br />mechanisms indicated potrntiel instability, turn with the existing tailings left in place. The factors of safety <br />calculated through the analysis were m the range between 0.85 and 0.91. <br />7~~5461~rECH-RQVi WPD 1 Ocrobcr 9, 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.