My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV99046
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV99046
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:23:01 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:23:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/26/1993
Doc Name
MEETING NOTES 01-06-93
From
DMG
To
HYDROLOGY TASK FORCE
Type & Sequence
PR3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII^ <br />STATE OF COLUlZAUU <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Sl., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phoney (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (3031 83 2-81 06 <br />DATE: January 26, 1993 <br />TO: Hydrology Task Force <br />FROM: David Serry~ <br />RE: Meeting Notes, January 6, 1993 <br />pF' c0~ <br />Rte. 4 <br />., 6 <br />Roy Rome. <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Long <br />Drv~swn Duector <br />Note: 1. Sorry for the late turnaround -- I forgot. <br />2. Given the rambling nature of the meeting, and given my lousy <br />notes, this summary is marginal at best. <br />Primarv Topic: <br />P&M submittal requesting declassification of a portion of the <br />Oak Creek AVF. <br />Presentation <br />Shawn presented a general discussion describing the P&M submittal. <br />Environmental factors were discussed including local hydrologic and <br />geologic regime, vegetation characteristics, land use and condition, <br />and previous permitting status. <br />It was indicated that the area in question was designated an AVF via <br />the original 1981 permit process, and now the operator requests that <br />this classification be removed. Apparently the operator is relying on <br />federal guidelines to make their case. <br />Some Meeting Member Recommendations: <br />1. Declassification may be acceptable, if all demonstrations are <br />provided. <br />2. We can use federal guidelines if they provide assistance, but <br />regardless, the state regulations must be used for the <br />evaluation. <br />3. While interesting, ultimate motivation for move is not relevant. <br />4. Additional information will be requested, probably including: <br />a. More detailed land use/condition mapping; <br />b. More detailed vegetation mapping; <br />c. More detailed soils information; <br />d. More detailed groundwater information (water table data). <br />/ern <br />M:\oss\ern\htfmtg.wp <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.