My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-04-10_REVISION - M1999034 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1999034
>
2003-04-10_REVISION - M1999034 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:58:27 PM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:23:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999034
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/10/2003
Doc Name
Comment and Objection Letters
From
DMG
To
ADCO Consulting Inc.
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Toppec Objection <br />Amendment No.l - Jeronimua Property <br />Permit # M-99-034 <br />lakes aze partially dewatered, this will lower the water table in the surrounding alluvial aquifer. A <br />lowered water table reduces the efficiency of my well's production and increases my pumping costs. <br />If water levels in the lakes aze reduced significantly, the resulting water level decline in the <br />surrounding aquifer may be such that my well would go dry when pumped A decline of the natural <br />water table groduced by actions of the applicant would resuh in injury to my decreed water right in <br />the irrigation well and the other exempt alluvial well. The applicant provides no hydrologic <br />assessment of the potential impact to surrounding structures from dewatering of the pit fakes. <br />In paragraph 4 of the mining notes and restrictions of Exhibit C-2 it is stated "Topsoil and <br />overburden stockpiles that are temporarily stored on site..., have a maximum height of 30',..." Item <br />#6 on page 3'of Exhibit D of the permit application also addresses topsoil and overburden excavation <br />and stockpiling. In this item, stockpiles are cited to be a maximum of 20' in height. Cleazly, there is <br />a 10-foot discrepancy between these two documents. The height of stotikpIles will influence their <br />runoff and erosion, slope stability, airborne particulate generation, and creation of visual <br />obstructions. Interested parties can not articulate objections to a mining plan when that plan contains <br />factual inconsistencies. <br />My concerns regazding water quality include remobilization of existing contaminants, herbicide <br />application, vehicular/equipment spills, and inadeguatepermit_compliance. The Fiendersoaarea of <br />Adams County is wit~m a ground water cgntaminant plume attn'buted to historical waste disposal <br />practices at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal. The arsenal, established in 1942, was one of the U. S. <br />Army's last chemical weapons manufacturing facilities to be built during World Wat II.. The ma1or <br />types o~co~~**,it,ants at the arsenal include pesticides, solvents, meta]s, and pesticide and chemical <br />munitions breakdown products. According to the Tri-County Heahh Department, arsenal related <br />contriminarion can be found both onpost and offpost. The majority of offpost contamination is found <br />in the shallow, unconfined aquifer. In the mid to late 1980s, an offsite contamination assessment <br />was conducted and the Henderson area, among others, was identified as containing high levels of <br />rliiennrnnvlmPth.~l.. O 11erVe---- - - - - <br />~ r ~ <br />gas, or sarin. In response to the findings of this investigation, the Water Quality Control Division of <br />the State of Colorado established a Colorado ground water standard of 8 µg/L for DIMP. This class <br />ofsemi-volatile organic compounds, though somewhat soluble, tends to adsorb on soil particles. <br />Criven the known contaminAnt plume in this azea, excavation activities associated with removal of <br />aggregate materials within the zone of water table fluctuation will remobilize COnt~nRrnc that had <br />adsorbed on the subsurface alluvial materials. This remobilization can produce an immediate threat <br />_ _ to humtln_health by ingestign_of Foptamirk~ted dcinki~ng water supplies. Potentiat healthimpacis <br />associated with remobilizatitin of known contaminants in this area have not been addressed by the <br />applicant. <br />While the applicants permit documentation mentions the existence of a Storm Water Management <br />Plan and permit in addition to a Spill Prevention Control Plan, these existing plans have not been <br />modified to reflect the addition of the Jeronimus Property or proposed mining plan thereon. The <br />mining plan, Exhibit D, indicates that piping will be installed to convey wash water back to the lake <br />areas from the Plant Site. Such a structure constitutes a point discharge to ground water and would <br />require issuance of a discharge permit from the Water Quality Control Division. Such a point <br />discharge may further concentrate existing contaminants dissolved in the ground water. The <br />applicant has not demonstrated the issuance or application for a Colorado Wastewater Dischazge <br />Permit for this property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.