Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />• • <br />C-&1-063: RN-02 B. Pavlik 2 <br />resource as required by rule 4.06.3(2)? Map HGP-16 indicates that the only topsoil <br />stockpile will be located at the base of the waste pile on the outslope of pond SP-2. <br />Once again the Division is concerned about protection of the topsoil pile from <br />contamination as per Rule 4.06.3(2). <br />II. Permit page 108 and drawing 5 indicate that the office area will not be graded to <br />blend with the pre-existing landscape. Although this is only a small area, <br />approximately 1.25 acres, has the Division granted a variance from regrading to <br />approximate original contour? {~.ti,,,,._: ~ ~~C_E.J ~;~~ <br />III. Reference to map HPG-7 indicates the scoria pit existed pre-law and will not be <br />reclaimed by Eastside mining. Has the land owner requested the access road <br />remain? Eastside mining proposes to leave the access road to the facilities and <br />hence to the scoria pit after reclamation of the office and facilities areas. Has this <br />variance to reclamation of the road been approved by the Division as per Rule <br />4.03.2(1)(f)? <br />IV. The Rifle loadout was removed from the permit in 1990. Page lOSa and 1990 <br />Findings reference the loadout. The operator should remove reference to the <br />loadout in the text or add the permitting history into the text to make it clear that <br />the loadout is no longer a part of this permit. <br />These questions may be answered internally, although I was not successful in finding the <br />answers. If you have any questions, seek me out. <br />m:\coal\jhb\c84063rn.2bp <br />