My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV98677
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV98677
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:22:43 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:20:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/20/1994
Doc Name
EAGLE MINE TR 24 C-81-044 SUBSIDENCE CONTROL PLAN FOR THE AMOCO OIL PIPELINE
From
DMG
To
TONY WALDRON
Type & Sequence
TR24
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />z <br />The agreement calls for excavation and replacement of the pipeline <br />before and after subsidence occurs. The pipeline must be replaced <br />in accordance with applicable Department of Transportation <br />regulations which require a minimum three feet of cover over the <br />pipe. The CEC/Amoco agreement specifies that this three feet of <br />cover material will be the material excavated from the pipe trench. <br />Amoco or CEC will then seed the reclaimed pipe corridor with the <br />rangeland seed mix in the Eagle mine permit or the cover crop mix <br />on the disturbed ground, where appropriate. This burial of the <br />pipeline and reseeding will restore the value of the disturbed land <br />and assure that any reasonably foreseeable postmine use of the land <br />is feasible, as required by Rule 4.20.1. <br />2. Existing regulatory authority of other government agencies <br />over oil and gas pipelines. <br />While our regulations ultimately hold CEC liable for mitigating <br />structural damages and restoring the value of land affected by <br />subsidence, at least two other government agencies also have <br />jurisdiction over the proposed pipeline work and potential oil <br />spills. The U.S. Department of Transportation regulations in 49CFR <br />Part 195 include standards for pipeline construction, including the <br />three foot cover requirement mentioned above. Associated DOT <br />regulations also address response plans and damage prevention <br />programs for pipeline operators. <br />The Colorado Department of Health, Water Quality Control Division <br />would be involved in any potential oil spill resulting from <br />subsidence or pipeline excavation. The CDOH approved CEC's <br />amendment to the mine's SPCC plan in regard to the containment <br />sumps downhill from the pipeline. <br />I believe the proposed pipeline work meets the regulatory <br />requirements of DMG, OSM, DOT, and CDOH. <br />3. Existing "policy" and court rulings in regard to liability for <br />subsidence damage. <br />I did some library and phone research in an attempt to determine <br />what the current status of the regulatory world's policy was in <br />regard to the question, "Does land which is disturbed as part of <br />subsidence control work need to be bonded and included in the <br />mine's ten year liability?". As far as i can determine, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.