REV98535 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DEC-19-00 TUE 1 101 AM SRK_CONSULTING DEN FAR N0. 30~ 5 9947 SAl(Gansulting estirnated 665,387 cubic yards to be placed into permatteltt stockpile areas is included in 'fable 6.1 (Material Movement Required for Reclamatiat). At DMGs direction a revised Table 6.1 can be submitted with a footnote stating, "Material Movement Required for Reclamation includes reclamation material volumes (rc-grading pit highwalls/bottom and topsoil placement) and also includes movement of soil to permanent soil stockpile areas". 5. The applicant accepts DMG's bond estimate of 51,325,2G~1.00. 6.4.12 Exhibit M -Other Penni[s and Licenses G. There is an existing Section 404 permit related to the original Distel area (Permit No. CO 089-74; Corps File # 198913658). The applicant met with Mr. Scott Franklin, Army Corps of Engineers, on December 5, 2000 to discuss the existing permit and the amendment areas fo dett:rmine thr: best option for the entire area. Rased upon the applicant's discussion with the Arrny Cotes of Engineers, the existing permit will continue in place to address mitigation of the Distel ar(•a wetlands. Separate permits for the amendment areas will be obtained from the Array Corps of Engineers as necessary, prior to conducting an activity that requires such per.•rlit(s). Any permits obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers for activities in the amendment areas will be incorporated m[o the mining and reclamation plan as they become available. Six wells arc noted in the adequacy review to be within 600 feet of proposed disturbance (2 weals on Peschell, 1 well on Distell, and 3 wells ott or immediately adjacent to Longmont tracts). However, it should be noted that the two well locations noted on Colorado Division of'vVater Resources records (reproduced following Exhibit C.4 in the amendment application) da not exist. Further review of Division records shows that the City of Longmont well petmit application was denied. Also, the Mountain State well application expired prior to a well being installed on the property. These Peschell property wells are noted as locations "O" and "X" on Exhibit C.4. It should also be noted that the permitted "well" located on the Distell property (noted as location 1 l on Exhibit C.4) is the gravel pit well permit fur the Camas aggregate mining operation. Finally, the three wells noted on or immediately adjacent to the Longmont tract (wells noted as numbers 6, 7 and ]0 on lixhibit C.4) are greater than 600 feet frutn the proposed training area, as shown on Exhibit D. W.: understand that the Office of the State Engineer requires that a waiver of objection must be obtained from all well owners within 600 feet of tlrc permit area, The applicant will not conduct de-watering activities until agreements with all applicable well owners is obtained. 1'he applicant is currently amending its existing well permit (No. 50945F) and the substitute supply plan far the current operations to include the amended Peschell and Longmont areas of operation. No groundwater will be exposed in the amendment aeeas without approval of tlu: amended substitute supply plan and the gravel pit u~cll permit by the Office of the State Erginecr. Evidence of a court-approved augmentation plan for Gnal reclamation requirements will be provided to DMG prior to requesting financial warranty release. 6.4.19 Exhibit S -Permanent Man-Made Structures 8. Attached are agreements that have been obtained wttlt the following owners of man-made "struchtres" within 200 feet of the proposed mine dislurbance limits: • Gary and Mhari M. Peschell (regarding property buildings); • US West (regarding a telephone line from \NCR 1 to [he Peschell residence); • Public Service Company (regarding natural gas and electricity lines Crom WCR to the Peschell residence); and • Left Hand Water District (regarding a water line along WCR 1). P. 03/ ] 3 N:\GKn:IIV'rojecr.SJ?a:\DMGRevRespLe[ dac