Laserfiche WebLink
02: 0a: 98 <br />r <br />~/ a a l <br />FftI 10: J3 F.~S 30J a89 289i RENDERSOCt 2000 PROJECT. <br />FINDINGS REQUIRt~ OTHER LJIYYS: A 6iotdgieal Aaseasment Vras prepared in oonjurtctlan with <br />the P.A Hy implementing the mitigation measures out9ned rn the EA, leas than significant impacts waua <br />be felt by threatened, endangeretl ar sensitive species, complying with Section 7 of the Threatened and <br />F~rdangered Spades Act <br />A Class 111 whurat resources inverrtory was conducted for the project in the summer of 1997. No snes <br />were discovered m the project area. <br />FOREST PLAN CONSISTENCY: Management direction oontained In the Forest Plan is used in analyzing <br />proposals by ptos¢eetive Forest users. AU permits far oecvoanty and use of National Forest System <br />lands txtvered by the Forest Plan must be consistent wdh +ts rnenagement duection. Feelers that were <br />considered in determining whether this project Is consistent wfth the Forest Plan are the following: <br />t. The selected altematke responds directly to Forest direedon mgarding the approval of special <br />usu. The essence of this dlreeeon a to discourage special uses an National Forest System <br />lands. This matter is dlacussed in relation to the air pollution. noise Impacts, adverse visual <br />resource Impaeb and wildlife safely hezard9 posed by Ora altematlve which would not require Ore <br />use of NaUenal Fdrest System lands, The proposed project is locates In Ole context of the <br />Henderson Mill and supporting Facilities, an area which is cumenlty industriaC¢ed within the <br />National Forest The proposed project also follows an existing udlily comtlor, a bancmission line <br />facility, In exlittenw across Nations{ Forest System lands. <br />2. National Forest System tondo in the protect area are classified as Management Proscription <br />4,3, dispersed retsaatlan, where sights and sounds of people are to be expected and may oven <br />be desired. Alterative 82 places the faciities en the edge of the National Forest, and meets these <br />criteria, <br />APPEAL RIC,HTS STATEMENT: This decision is subject to appeal pursuant to 36 CFR 215.7. A Notice <br />of Appeal must he submitted within 45 days after publication of the notic,3 of this decision in the Rocky <br />Mountain Maws, Notices of Appeal must rte sent to ~ Chief, USDA rarest Service, 14th and tndependenw <br />Southwest, 201 lath SVeet, Washington D.C. 2050 /ATTN: Appeals Deciding Offlcar. Appeals must <br />meet content requirements of 36 CFR 215.14. <br />If no appeal is received, Imptamentatian a(lhis decision may occur on, but not belore, five (5) business <br />days from the close of the appeal filing period. <br />INFORMATION CONTACT PERSON; For additional irrfonnatlan CanGen+ing this decision or Ole Forest <br />Service appeal process, contact Richard Phelps, District Ranger, Sulphur Ranger District, 9 ten Mlla <br />Orive,•Post OMce cox 10, Granby, Colorado 80446. (870) 8871100, <br />~-~• --- <br />TOM THOMP5ON <br />Deputy Regional Forester <br />Rocky Mountain Region <br />USDA Forest SeMtx <br />zlytgB <br />Date <br />rcwlworknre's.41a'pgsaiera'AYr~ersrrwrnr oA.mirrs~o*r~giv' ao,,:rseair• ! <br />