Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Memo to Burnell <br />August 25, 2000 <br />Page 3 of 4 Pages <br /> in the name of Colowyo Coal Company L.P. The <br /> question is still open on the reclamation liability <br /> if these wells aze transferred to Colowyo as a <br /> landowner (transfer under Rule 4.05.14). <br />41 and 43 through 50 UL-96-29, 96-32, 96- These holes are reported as having been <br /> 33, 96-34, 96-35, 96- reclaimed (Table 1). <br /> 36, 96-37, 96-38,and <br /> 96-39 <br />70 97-27 This hole is reported as having been reclaimed <br /> (Table 1). <br />The following holes have been, as reported in Table 1, mining through. <br />Line Items of Table 1 Hole Numbers Comments <br /> <br />1 through 4 and 15 89-4-1,89-4-2,89-4- <br />through 17 3,89-4-4,89-9-10, <br /> 89-9-11,and 89-10-8 <br />32 UL-95-40 Indicated as mined through on Table 1. Probably <br /> an error. Clarification is requested of Colowyo in <br /> m draft letter. <br />47, 48, and 58 96-36, 96-37, and 96- <br /> 47 <br />60, 65, 68 and 69 97-12, 97-22, 97-25 <br /> and 97-26 <br />By TR 50 (Table 1, Line Items 18 through 30), the alternate reclamation of cover by excess spoil <br />(West Pit Fill) is reported for Holes 4-94-2, 4-94-3, 4-94-4, 4-94-5, 4-94-6, 4-94-9, 4-94-10, 4-94- <br />11, 4-94-12, 4-94-13, 4-94-14, 4-94-15, and 4-94-16. No retention of surface reclamation cost <br />liability is appropriate as spoil valley fills cover any disturbed surfaces. No record of them being <br />sealed has been recovered as of yet, but sealing would have been standard practice. Sealing them <br />at this time is impossible. <br />The following holes aze reported under TR 50 (Table 1) as having not been drilled <br />Line Item Number Holes Authorized by Minor <br />Revision Number Comments <br />5 89-4-5 12 <br />39 and 40 UL-95-46 and <br />UL-95-47 35 <br />42 96-31 40 <br />