Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. ,4frcr'iret Boulry/,b9s. Swa • <br />Drtnsa'.n of A9merab mzf Gm/ogy <br />Sep~iln 29, 1999 <br />Page 9 <br />SCC believes that sufficient documentation has been provided to allow the Division to make a fording <br />that material damage is not an issue in these instances. SCC respectfully suggests that these responses <br />provide sufficient and adequate information for the Division to approve the Yoast Mine PROl so that <br />Seneca can proceed with timely development of the area prior to acrual mining of the Wadge coal <br />seam. <br />4.05.6 and 4.05.9 Sedimentation Ponds and Impotmdments <br />Comment 36 (Origtnal ConrrertJ SCC u proposing m ccrutruct thrte Harm salnnartaticrr pxeds (Ponds 012, <br />013, and 014). The designs subrrrittal for rlxse proposal ponds do not rnditde r{x gerota-lnucal analyses mqunul <br />for such fentcsms by Rule 4.05.6(I1JGJ. Plr~tse pnnnde the rafrairal gmtcdaticnl mwfjres for ead~ pore! 71,e <br />relttaal gaxalaiical analyses mast .show a mirtnrum: static safety factor of 1. s and a setsruc safety factor of 1.2 for <br />ponds loofa! velxre failure venrtld he exp~tsl to cicu~e loss of life or serious property dmr~. Pond 014 may lr <br />&alt rn dose proxrirtiry to an existirrgdzca4»tg/property orcrea: <br />We also note that aU the sat~ter>r ponds evil! store venter; arul that tlx venter storage-will likely !x to a vertir~rl <br />lxiglit greater thmz 10 feet, mtd suds sroragr rvi/l le lrlivrd a ctrtsnza7af enlzaebnart Far this reason, tle <br />pat~isicns of Rule 4.OS.9(3J apply to these ponds, aryl t{x»efom the p/ovisiai of CR.S 37-87-1OS must be <br />referatml Our recierv of CR.S 37-87-105 vtdiraies that tle aal matntg ngulatiats ai 4.05.6 and 4.OS.9 <br />adaluately address tl~ prauisicrt ofCR.S 37-87-105, wdh one exmptun CR.S. 37-87-105 te~uires all pwed< <br />m /x avrshuctel to a safety factor or 1.5. <br />Please pnrr~ide the geatefz»ur/ arutlyyses requi~al by rule 4.OS.6(11 JGJtar e~uh paxL Due m tfx size of the ponds <br />and tlx associataf amount of enter storage, tle gmta'rn:ica! analyses should fx des:gnel to mgt the regtrirerrtatts of <br />Rule 4.05.6(1 ]JGJ. This gaxa!»raral analyse veould ensure omplimt~ venth Rules 4.OS.6(1 ]JGJ, 4.05.9(3), and <br />CR. S. 37-87- ]OS. <br />(Response submitted 07/15/99) The updated design and stability analysis documentation for the <br />construction of Pond 012 was previously submitted in TR-11 as Exhibit 13-12.2, Proposed Pond 012 <br />Design (6/28/99), and Attachment 13-13, Sedimentation Pond 012 Stability Analysis (5/26/99). The <br />updated design and documentation for the construction of Ponds 013 and 014 are included in this <br />PR-Ol for insertion into the PAP. <br />Comment 36 (September 8, 1999) SCCprwidal stability analyses forpxrtds 013 and 014. T)xanalysis <br />ntdirates that the anfzat,6rtau of pond 013 ve~ill hate a minirrnan static safety factor in exmss of 1. s. 7lx <br />Diriuiort has no fun{xr tprKen7-s rcgmdmg the designs for pond 013. We vecwld like to rertnul SCC that tl~ <br />er~vxmrrrrg npams disacsral rn thx Ramsnerlatiazs"sfeticru of rlx stability analyses slnuld Er submittal to tlx- <br />Diuision wirli the as-built m~tifuadan far tlx ponds, if oat More. if mrtdiitau dtJferent thmt tlxue asswnel in d~ <br />analyses are enmtma~ral dsnmg mnrMrctiat, ve s:~ggest tint SCC contact the Diu+ion aroreGately to dtsczus <br />submqueru plmrs mtd ctrtsCrruYAaL <br />The stability analysis for pond 014 »nGrntes a minvrnart static safety of 1.4. As discussal rn the Diviaats' <br />onginal curnr~t, Rsde 4.OS.9(3J(aJ ra~cires a mv7nrttmr static safety faetrn of 1.5 for nrr(xxox7Srrarts venth <br />art&mkmatts in exmss of ten fit. Phase refer to tlx original mraneu H36 and pnnade mt analysis or molifial <br />arc<tnnritn plmu zPhid~ msrlt at a mv+nracn static safety factrn of 1. s. <br />(Response to September 8, 1999 Comment) The stability analysis for sedimentation pond 014 has <br />been revised and a factor of safety of 1.5 has been achieved. As stated in the recommendations <br />section of the report, prior to construction of the pond, SOC will collect and test soil samples from <br />the base and borrow areas to verify the subgrade and borrow material strength parameters used in <br />association with the stability report. <br />