Laserfiche WebLink
and amend the referenced notation on the map as appropriate. In addition, please <br />provide an amended construction certification for the permanent channel, which <br />specifically addresses the adequacy of the channel to pass the design flow with <br />required freeboard, without reliance on berms. The amended permit map and <br />construction certification will need to be provided prior to issuance of a proposed <br />decision on the Phase 1 bond release application. <br />4. Rule 4.10.2(2) requires P.E. inspection and certification of coal mine waste banks at <br />least quarterly throughout the period of construction. The rule allows for the <br />inspections to be terminated upon completion of final grading, cover soiling and <br />revegetation, unless the Division requires a longer period of time for such <br />inspections. CRDA-1 and RSRDA refuse areas have not been fully reclaimed, and as <br />such the inspections cannot be terminated at this time. CRDA-2 has now been final <br />graded, cover soiled and revegetated, and as such termination of quarterly P.E. <br />inspection and certification may be appropriate. <br />Prior to authorizing termination of the quarterly P.E. inspection and certification for <br />CRDA-2, the Division requests that a designated Final P.E Certification be provided. <br />The final report would need to certify that all aspects of construction and <br />reclamation were conducted in accordance with the approved plans and applicable <br />regulations, and that there are no indicators of potential failure or other potential <br />hazards to human life or property. Upon review of the final certification, the <br />Division will either authorize termination of P.E. inspections, or require continued <br />inspections if warranted. <br />The bond release application notes in various sections that final reclamation <br />including topsoil replacement has been completed in a number of locations, and the <br />cost estimate comparison in Tab 3 of the application implies that costs associated <br />with topsoil replacement should be deleted from the liability amount in conjunction <br />with the Phase 1 bond release. Although it is true that topsoiling has been <br />completed in various locations, the adequacy of topsoil replacement is not a <br />component of the Phase 1 bond release evaluation, and bond liability associated <br />with topsoil replacement cannot be released in a Phase 1 bond release. Topsoil <br />replacement is evaluated and monetary release associated with topsoiling can be <br />granted by Phase II bond release, upon demonstration of adequate vegetation <br />establishment. Refer to Rules 3.03.1(2)(a) and Ib), and discussion of Phase I and . <br />Phase II bond release in the Division's 1995 Guide/ine Regarding Se/acted Coa/ Mine <br />Bond Release Issues. <br />In the cost estimate to be prepared by DMG for the Phase 1 bond release, no liability <br />will be released for topsoil replacement (although release will be granted for the non- <br />toxic cover or subsoil replaced beneath the 6" top-dressing layer at the refuse <br />areasl. <br />6. Certain other aspects of the Division's anticipated bond release decision may <br />warrant some explanation. In certain facility areas, it is probable that our decision <br />will reflect a limited, or partial Phase 1 release. One example would be the overland <br />conveyor corridor, where facilities have been removed but backfilling and grading <br />has not been completed. Similarly, at the South Portal Area, certain facilities have <br />been demolished and removed (most of the preparation plant buildings and <br />structures) but other facilities remain, and backfilling and grading has not been <br />completed. The South Portals concrete seals have been installed, but the portal <br />openings have not been backfilled outby the seals, and the portal vicinity has not <br />been backfilled and graded. In these cases, liability release would be granted and <br />3 <br />