REV97997

• Permit No: C1981010
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 9/1/1995
• Doc Name: Midterm Review Findings
• Type & Sequence: MT3
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

BE DONE BY MEANS OF THE LUX WELL ITSELF, IF THE OWNER IS AGREEABLE, OR BE MEANS
OF A SEPARATE WELL. IF A SEPARATE WELL IS UTILIZED FOR THE MONITORING, IT SHALL BE
COMPLETED IN THE EQUIVALENT ZONE OR AQUIFER ITJ WHICH THE LUX WELL 1S COMPLETED.
IT SHALL BE LOCATED AT A POINT DIRECTLY UPDIP FROM THE LUX WELL WHERE THE
ENTIRE ZONE OF THE LUX WELL CAN BE MONITORED AND IT SHALL BE AT A POINT WHERE
WATER LEVELS MAY BE RECORDED AND WATER QUALITY SAMPLES REPRESENTATIVE OF THAT
ZONE MAY BE RECOVERED.
THIS SCHEDULE OF MONITORING SHALL BE QUARTERLY AND THE DATA RECORDED SHALL BE
INCORPORATED AND INTERPRETED M THE ANNUAL HYDROLOGIC REPORT FOR THE MINE.
THE PARAMETERS APPEARING ON L[ST B (P. 4-241C OF THE PERMIT APPLICATION) SHALL BE
RECORDED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, STARTING WITH THE QUARTER M WHICH THE MONITORING
BEGINS. THE PARAMETERS APPEARING ON THE FOLLOWING LIST SHALL BE RECORDED
DURING THE SUCCEEDMG THREE QUARTERS OF THE MONITORING YEAR:
WATER LEVEL PH
CONDUCTIVITY TDS
ARSENIC BARIUM
CADMIUM CHROMIUM
LEAD SELENIUM
COPPER IRON
MANGANESE FLUORIDE
NITRITE NITRATE
SULFATE
Stipulation Nos. 10 and 12 aze ongoing and aze satisfied each year by submittal of the pertinent data
in the Annual Report. For the minor revisions listed in Section II of this Midterm Review, none
were field revisions that had stipulations attached.
SECTION IV -MIDTERM ADEQUACY QUESTIONS
The Division has the following adequacy questions. The Division would appreciate a timely
response.
Rule 2.04.4(1) and (21
In Section 2.9, "Archaeological, Cultural and Historic Resources," on page 2-591 of the permit
application, it is stated that field surveys have failed to locate site SMF949. Please reseazch
this matter and update page 2-591.
Rule 2.04.6(2)(b)(il(El
2. Please update Table 2.7-10, "Percent of Sulfur Forms in Trapper Mine Coal," on page 2-399, to
include the H and K-L-M seams.
4