Laserfiche WebLink
,= 19etcyli Fit~Cl•.yEG1Oy~J FHOIIE I10. ~ 57U '__= SE='~ IL ~, l! 1`!'?3 11:13RM P6 <br />3 <br />surveyed for upgrading. Surface visibility W3S shghtl\' hl!•Irei. ~O" 5, than the rest of the drill hole <br />site. <br />A "prehistoric site" was defined ntinimaliy as ~ collection often pikes of debitagc within <br />a discrete area, a tool with five pieces of debitagc, nr arty resource that consisted of or included a <br />feature. A "historic site" was defined as a stntcntrz or earth disturbance associated with artifacts SG <br />}•rs old or more or a dense concentration of historic artifacts ~U yes oid or morn. <br />]solated finds were considerzd to bz any ether culttual resources that did not meet the <br />requirements to be a historic nr prehistoric site, including isolated lustoric or prehistoric artifacts and <br />htstoitc prospect pits lacking artifacts or other struztural remains. - <br />All cultural resources were recorded on the appropriate OAHP site.. isolated find, or re- <br />evaluation forms. Sketch maps cvzre made mid photogrlphs taken of resource; where appropriate. <br />Artifact collection was limited to temporally diagnostic prehistoric artifacts. <br />Results <br />No culnual materials ware encountered during the sw-t-z}- of thz tluee drill hole locations and <br />the. access road. <br />Potential for l7uidentified Cultural Resources <br />There is little potential for wtidentified significant cultural resotuces in any of the areas <br />surveyed. "fhe project area wire adequately im-entoried for cultural res<.;urce, ss ground visibility <br />was good for the current project m•ea. In addition the ci~ent project area does not contain mry azeas <br />with the potential to contain buried cultural materials that would not have a surface expression. <br />Historic resources are less affected by surface visibility and topography. and the potential for <br />undiscovered significant historic resources within thz project m•ea is eery few. <br />Evaluation of Kesearclr <br />The rzsults of the culau~al resource invcntnn' somewhat followed the expected results. As <br />predicted prehistoric isolated finds krould ba the most common. F.~•en though the ground visibility <br />was good, the paucity of prehistoric sites in the areas surveyed ~cas not unexpected, given rite low <br />number of previously r~cordcd sites in the current project area, the rathar small more intermiLient <br />drainages and associated ridges. <br />Management Summary/Recommendatimts <br />The current ptuiect area did not contain ruty cultural rasonre?.^.. In addition, the. current <br />project area does not contain any areas with the potential m contain buried cultural materials that <br />