My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV97633
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV97633
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:56 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:11:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/13/1998
Doc Name
MEMO GOLDEN EAGLE RECLAMATION COST ESTIMATE
From
DMG
To
KENT GORHAM
Type & Sequence
SL1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiii~i~i <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmem rr Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 ~`y` ~~~ <br />Denvcr, Colorado RO?03 IIIr <br />Phone. (303) R66-3567 <br />FAX: f3U31 AR-RI Uh <br />interoffice DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />M E M O R A N D U M RESOURCES <br />Rov Romer <br />Governor <br />to: Kent Gorham <br />from: Janet H. Binns <br />subject: Golden Eagl cl ati Cost Estimate <br />date: August 13, 1 <br />lames 5. Lo<hhearl <br />Eaecm rve Director <br />Michael B Long <br />Division Director <br />Kent, after searching for, and not finding Harry's documentation or computer disk from when he <br />updated the estimate in 1996... I basically started from scratch. <br />I removed costs that we have granted Phase I bond release , SL-O1. I included waste pile subsoil <br />costs, But kept all topsoil costs in the estimate, until such time as phase II bond is applied for and <br />released. <br />I removed any costs associated with TR-47 approval. From the public SJ_-02 file I had, it <br />appears that SL-02 has not received approval as of this date. To keep the process "clean". T kept <br />the SL-02 costs in this estimate, and labeled them as such so that they will be easily extracted <br />when SL-02 reaches a decision. <br />One cost 1 could not find depth and diameter detail on in the permit was for sealing of the 5 <br />monitoring wells. I did include a cost for ongoing water monitoring as required by the permit. <br />If there are tasks that should remain in the estimate that weren't readily apparent to me, please <br />send me a memo (or e-mail). On the ditch reclamation, I was unsure on what length of ditches <br />remain out there so I just took Harry's cost for ditch reclamation. Based on your observation of <br />the site, does that cost need refinement? <br />Now we start getting into that weird territory with reclamation cost liability estimates. We have <br />released 60% of the costs of back filling and grading, demolition, etc. (SL-O1). Remaining tasks <br />to be completed (or requested for release) are less than that remaining 40% of the bond that we <br />are required to keep based upon rule 3.03.2(a) So You (lead specialist) may want to keep an <br />understanding of how much we can release based on regulatory limits, vs. what we estimate is <br />actually necessary to reclaim whatever is remaining. <br />I will be back briefly on 8/24, then I expect to back in the office on August 28th. So if you need <br />me to define/refine something with this, you'll have to catch me then. I did not copy the disk, so <br />please keep the disk with the estimate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.