My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV97595
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV97595
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:55 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:10:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981080
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/6/1995
Doc Name
TEZAK STONE AND AGGREGATE SUPPLY CO PERMIT M-81-080 AMENDMENT
From
AZURITE INC
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r ~ III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />AZURITE, INC. <br />1000 I CR 12 P.O. Box 338 <br />CoTOPAxI, co e I z23 ~~('.FIVEj~: <br />(7 19) 942-41 78 <br />FAX: (719) 942-4178 OCT 06 1995 <br />Division or minerals a (;eulogy <br />OCTOBER 3, 1995 <br />MR. LARRY OEH LER <br />COLORADO DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />131 3 SHERMAN STREET RM 2 1 5 <br />DENVER, CO 80203 <br />RE: TEZAK STONE AND AGGREGATE SUPPLY CO., PERMIT M-8 I -080 AMENDMENT <br />DEAR MR. OEHLER, <br />PLEASE ACCEPT MY APOLOGY FOR ANY CONFUSION I MIGHT OF CAUSED YOU IN REGARDS TO THE <br />STATS OF THE TEZAK CONSTRUCTION/TEZAK STONE AND AGGREGATE PERMIT STATIS. WHEN I LAST <br />TALKED WITH YOU IN EARLY SEPTEMBER, I CALLED TO CHECK ON THE STATIS OF REVIEW OF THE <br />PERMIT AMENDMENT APPLICATON. AT THAT TIME, YOU TOLD ME THAT THE PERMIT AMENDMENT <br />WOULD NOT BE ADDRESSED UNTIL THE SUCCESSION OF OPERATOR PROCESS WAS COMPLETED. <br />AT THAT TIME, I ASSUMED THAT ANY ACTION TO BE TAKEN ON YOUR PART WOULD FOLLOW FROM MY <br />TELEPHONE CALL TO YOU EARLIER IN THE SUMMER CONFIRMING THAT THE MINING OPERATION HAS <br />EXPANDED OUTSIDE OF THE ORIGINAL BOUNDARIES (I PERFORMED A PACE AND COMPASS SURVEY <br />ON THE MINING PROPERTY AFTER YOU SENT ME THE ORIGINAL MINE PLAN MAP) BY THE 2.7 ACRES <br />THAT WOULD INCLUDE DISTURBED GROUND USED FOR TRUCK TURNING ON THE EAST END OF THE <br />PROPERTY NEAR THE SCALES AND MOSTLY ON THE WEST END OF THE MINING AREA WHERE <br />CRUSHER STOCKPILES AND ASPHALT MIXING EgUIPM ENT WAS POSITONED DURING THE 1 994 <br />HIGHWAY REPAVING PROJECT. THERE IS APP. 2.5 ACRES OF GROUND ON THE WEST END OF THE <br />PROPERTY THAT WAS USED FOR STORAGE OF HIGHWAY GAURD RAIL POSTS AND RAILING UNTIL <br />THEY WERE INSTALLED IN 1994 AND EQUIPMENT AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION WORKER AND <br />EQUIPMENT PARKING DURING THE 1994 SEASON. THIS AREA HAS BEEN RECLAIMED VIA TOPSOIL <br />IMPORTED FROM A NEARBY U$ 50 RIVER PARK CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, SEEDED AND MULCHED <br />AS DESCRIBED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATON DOCUMENT. IN FACT, THE OPERATOR, MIKE TEZAK, <br />HAS RECLAIMED AREAS BOTH EAST AND WEST OF THE CURRENT MINING ZONE THAT INCLUDED OLD <br />HIGHWAY DEPT. GRAVEL EXTRACTON AREAS AND STOCKPILE AREAS THAT PREDATE THE ORIGINAL <br />198 I PERMIT. I BELIEVE THAT A SITE VISIT WOULD CLARIFY YOUR QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE <br />DISTURBED AREA OUTSIDE THE ORIGINAL PERMIT BOUNDARIES. <br />I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED SHOP BUILDING SITE WITH YOU. THE OPERATOR <br />IS PLANNING ON BUILDING A SHOP FACILTY TO SERVICE HIS SMALL FLEET OF HIGHWAY <br />CONSTR UCTON EOUIPM ENT, NOT RELATED TO THE MINING OPERATION. ALTiOUGH SOME LOADING <br />AND RI P-RAP PRODUCTION IS PERFORMED BY THE OPERATORS HIGHWAY CONSTR UCTON <br />EQUIPMENT, 9O% OF ALL MINING IS PERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTOR DURING THE HIGHWAY <br />PAVING PROJECT, EVERY FOUR TO FIVE YEARS. WHILE THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE OPERATOR <br />WAS NOT TO INCLUDE THE SHOP BUILDING SITE WITHIN THE AFFECTED LAND BOUNDARIES AND <br />WHILE NEARBY, NOT PART OF THE MINING OPERATION, I WOULD LIKE TO REVIEW THE SHOP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.