My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV97552
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV97552
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:53 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:10:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/16/1983
Doc Name
COTTERS COMMENT RESPONSES SET FORTH BELOW ARE ADDRESSED TO THE MLRB COMMENTS TRANSMITTED TO COTTER B
Type & Sequence
HR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />• COTTER'S COMMENT RESPONSES SET FORTH BELOYJ ARE ADDRESSED TO THE M.L.R.B. <br /> COMMENTS TRANSMITTED TO COTTER BY JIM McARDLE IN HIS MARCH 16, 1983 LETTER <br />McArdle Comment D.7 <br />"YJhat is the uranium content of the rock currently being placed in the <br />waste dumps?" <br />Cotter Response <br />Please see Cotter's response to Pendleton Comment iJl, attached herf~to. <br />McArdle Comment D.8 <br />"In the original application, it was stated that, "Rock taken from the ore <br />sorter reject pile containing approximately .0159° uranium or less will be <br />stockpiled at the waste dump (west dump) at the rate of 2,000 tons/month". <br />This rock containing 0.15N uranium will comprise approximately 29% of the <br />total waste dump volume. Please clearly detail how the uranium content of <br />the ore sorter reject material has fluctuated over time together with the <br />rate of deposition on each dump site and the size gradations of ore sorter <br />• reject. What percent of the total waste dump volume is ore sorter reject <br />for the east dump and the west dump." <br />Cotter Response <br />The uranium content of sorter reject has ranged between 0.15°o U30B and <br />0.055°; U30g, although during a brief time sorter reject uranium content <br />was as high as 0.06 UgOg. Amore detailed discussion of the weighed <br />average uranium content of the waste dump, and the contributions to the <br />dump from sorter reject and mine development waste is provided in Cotter's <br />response to Pendleton Comment ~1. <br />McArdle Comment E.6.a-c <br />"Why has the operator eliminated the following items from the waste dump <br />reclamation plan: <br />a. The 6 inch clay cover which will be compacted to approximately 95°6 <br />of maximum? <br />b. Approximately 4 to 6 inches of topsoil placed over the top and sides <br />of the waste dumps by the use of heavy equipment? <br />c. A diversion channel constructed immediately upslope from the top <br />• of the waste dump?" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.