My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV97461
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV97461
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:49 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:09:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/30/1999
Doc Name
WEST ELK TR-88
From
DMG
To
MOUNTAIN COAL CO LLC
Type & Sequence
TR88
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-iii ~uiuii ~ u <br />STATE OF COLGi~UO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Urp.ininrnl of ,V,vural Krsources <br />141 i tihennan 51.. Room ? 1 5 <br />Denver, Colorado R0.:OS <br />I'hunc: i %W 1 71bb- i56: <br />rr~a I uru asz nuu, <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />0,11 Onens <br />Governor <br />Grel; E. Watcher <br />6ecwrve Dite<wr <br />Michael0 Lonp <br />Dlvi.ian Due. tnr <br />Ms. Christine Johnston <br />Mountain Coal Company LLC <br />P.O. Box 59l <br />Somerset CO 81434 <br />Re: West Elk TR 88 <br />Dear Ms. Johnston: <br />March 30, 1999 <br />The Division has completed review of Mountain Coal Company's submittal of Technical Revision <br />Number 88, revised hydrologic monitoring plan for the West Elk Mine. Several issues should be <br />addressed based on Rules 2.0~.6(3)(b)(iv) and 4.05.13(1)(b). <br />First, the Division feels that monitoring is needed in the B-seam in the vicinity of the Box Canyon unit <br />proposed in Permit Revision 08. Rule 2.0~.6(3)(b)(iv) requires that the groundwater regime be <br />chazacterized within and adjacent to the petirtit he chazacterized and monitored. Although the area <br />already mined can be considered well characterized hydrologically, we feel it is not warranted to <br />extrapolate those conditions over a distance of several miles without additional data. IviCC should <br />propose additional monitoring in the vicinity of the Box Canyon unit, preferably downgradient of the <br />azea proposed for mining. <br />Secondly, some monitoring of groundwater in the alluvium near the RPE (Refuse Pile Extension) is <br />needed, preferably an up-gradient and adown-gradient well if the conditions aze appropriate. Please <br />add monitoring wells in the RPE area. <br />The third issue involves the underground sumps in the northwest panels. MCC's discussion in the <br />Probable Hydrologic Consequences section of the permit predicts that only very small amounts of water <br />will migrate on its own out of the sumps. Given the large volumes of water in these sumps. the Division <br />requests that some means be provided within the monitoring plan to confirm that prediction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.