My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV97405
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV97405
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:46 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:08:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984065
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/11/1991
Doc Name
COAL RIDGE 1 MINE C-84-065 PR 2 2ND ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
MLRD
To
NCIG FINANCIAL INC
Type & Sequence
PR2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III ~ <br />STATE Or~ t;ui,uxaDO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION DF ~o <br />Department of Natural Resources ,~~; =q~ <br />7373 Sherman St., Room 275 ~<~~(QQ(~~ <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />y.~L~„~. <br />303 866.3567 ~ ra7s <br />FF,x: 303 8328706 <br />Roy Aomer. <br />Governor <br />June 11, 1991 Frey A. Banta. <br />Drvisirrn Direcror <br />Mr . E. Peter hla tth i es <br />NCIG Financial, Inc. <br />747ti E. Arkansas Avenue, Unit 104 <br />Denver, CO 80231-2562 <br />Re: Coal Ridge No. 1 Mine (C-84-065), Permit Revision 2, <br />Second Adequacy Review <br />Dear Mr. Matthies: <br />The Division has reviewed the adequacy responses for this revision, submitted <br />by you on June 6, 1991. The following issues remain to be resolved prior to <br />the Division's proposed decision. <br />Section 5.1.5 states that irrigates lano in the vicinity of the proposed <br />loadout is limited to the south side of the Colorado Rive, while the revises <br />Figure 5.1-1 shows irrigated land along the Hallett Ditch, on the north side <br />approximately 2000 feet downstream from the proposed loadout. Please clarify <br />the present use of this land ono modify the text or tigure accordingly. <br />The lease boundary description in Exhibit 2.2-1 (states 3.6 acres leased area) <br />and the description of the permit area in the appl ication (4.35 acres) do not <br />agree. Additionally, the north arrow on these ti gores is incorrectly drawn, <br />so that the boundary description is difficult to check against the mapped <br />permit area boundaries. One or more of these information sources must be <br />updated so that the legal description of the permit area is unambiguous and <br />agrees with the mapped boundaries. <br />Finally, note that well LA-1 is subject to quarterly <br />sampling, and must theefore be sampled prior to the <br />forward the results of this sample to the Division as <br />Sinceely, <br />~~~CGc~ ~ ~Gi~ <br />William B. Crick <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />WBC/en <br />CC: Jim Stevens, MLRD <br />Mike Galloway, Adrian Brown Consultants <br />David Sturges <br />field parameters <br />end of June. Please <br />soon as possible. <br />62 9 7F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.