My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV97388
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV97388
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:45 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:08:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/4/1990
Doc Name
SENECA II-W MINE PROPOSED DECISION TO RENEW A VALID EXISTING PN C-82-057
From
MLRD
To
PEABODY COAL CO WESTERN DIV
Type & Sequence
RN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PROPOSED DECISION <br />for <br />Approval of hermit Renewal <br />Pursuant to C.R.S. 34-33-109(7), the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />proposes to approve the renewal of a permit to conduct surface coal mining and <br />reclamation operations at the Seneca II-W Mine. <br />This decision is based on a review of the complete and accurate application <br />and the existing permit, including all conditions and revisions approved up to <br />October ZG, 1990. In accordance with C.R.S. 34-33-109(7)(a), the Division <br />makes a determination of the absence of the following criteria which would <br />warrant that the permit not be renewed: <br />1, The terms and conditions of the valid, existing permit are not being <br />satisfactorily meet; <br />2, The present surface coal mining and reclamation operation is not in <br />compliance with all requirements of the Colorado Surface Coal Mining <br />Reclamation Act, C.R.S. 34-33-101 et seq., and the Regulations <br />prortulgated thereunder; '-' ` <br />3, The renewal requested substantially jeopardizes the permittee's <br />continuing responsibility on existing permit areas; <br />4, The operator has not provided evidence that the performance bond in <br />effect for the operation will continue in full force for the proposed <br />period of renewal as well as any additional bond required; <br />5, Any additional revised or updated information as required has not been <br />provided. <br />Based on a preponderance of the evidence, the permit issued to Peabody Coal <br />Co, Western Div. meets the requirements under the right of successive renewal. <br />The permit application will remain a binding part of the permit. Renewal of <br />the permit will be fora term of five (5) years. <br />I conclude that there is no basis for denying the renewal. <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />~- .~ ~ <br />,- <br />Directsr ~) <br />9233G <br />~ , <br />Da e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.