Laserfiche WebLink
~;. <br />Jce Dudash <br />Page 3 <br />April 7, 1997 <br />3. Anew diversity standard is proposed. While the proposed standard appears reasonable, <br />there is no explanation of how it was derived, or what it ~s based on. Please explain the basis <br />for the proposed diversity standard. <br />4. Trapper proposes to drop the use of all established vegetation reference areas since standards <br />for cover, production, woody stem density and species diversity will all be set I the permit. <br />However......... <br />JOE AND DAVE- TALK TO ME ABOUT HOW YOU WANT TO DEAL WITH <br />THIS ONE AND I'LL FINISH THIS MEMO. In a nutshell, because there is no <br />regulatory basis for the cover standard (see no. I in "General Comments"), it might be <br />worth keeping the approved reference areas in place. Then again, if we get the <br />technical standard bit into the rules, the reference areas may become a mute point. <br />cc: David Berry <br />c:\wpdocs\tapper. mr <br />^ <br />