Laserfiche WebLink
~. <br />~~~ I~~I~~I~~~~I~~~~ <br />To: Jce Dudash <br />From: Larry Routte i~ <br />Subject: Trapper Mine, MR-71; Reveg success stds. <br />Date: April 7, 1997 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />I reviewed Trapper's MR 147. The revision basically proposes to change the success <br />standards for shrub density and species diversity. Since the Trapper permit already contains <br />"technical" standards for cover and production, the company proposes to eliminate their <br />vegetation reference areas with the changes to shrub and diversity standards..The revision <br />also clarifies some of the sampling plans that Trapper will follow while collecting data related <br />to bond release applications. <br />Here are two sets of comments/questions for your consideration. The f rst set of general <br />comments have to do with parts of the Trapper permit which are only indirectly involved in <br />this MR. You may want to deal with them now, or later. The second set of comments <br />pertain to MR-147. <br />General Comments <br />The permit contains a success standard for cover which is derived by back-calculating <br />the amount of cover required to hold erosion to an amount which the NRCS says is <br />acceptable for the soils disturbed by the mine. There are two concerns with these <br />standards. <br />A. This means of establishing revegetation success standards is referred to as <br />"technical standards" in the regulations. DMG is only allowed to approve <br />technical standards in conjunction with OSM approval, which was not done in <br />the case of the standards in the Trapper permit. DMG is presently in the <br />preliminary stages of arule-making effort in which allowance will be made for <br />DMG to approve technical standards. In the mean time, there is no <br />regulatory basis for the cover standards in the Trapper permit. <br />B. The live vegetative cover standards for range sites A, B and C are 33%, 29%, <br />and 25%, respectively. These values are relatively low in comparison to <br />other northwest Colorado coal mines. The Trapper permit acknowledges <br />that one of the factors that should be considered in assessing cover success <br />standards is the rate of soil genesis. The USLE assumptions that the Trapper <br />standards are derived from allow for annual loss of 4 tons/acre year of topsoil. <br />This would be equivalent to loss of one foot of topsoil in 464 years. In <br />northwest Colorado, it takes thousands of years for a foot of topsoil to form. <br />Finally, the 1980 baseline information in the Trapper permit indicates that the <br />live vegetative cover in the mountain shrub and sage/grass reference areas <br />was 37.7% and 33.0%, respectively. <br />^ <br />