Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION <br />This technical revision to the permit to conduct coal mining operations at [he <br />Trapper Mine involves changes in the drainage and sediment control plan for <br />the areas drained by Johnson Gulch and Pyeatt Gulch. The revision to the <br />Johnson Gulch plan is necessitated by the impending removal of an existing <br />sedimentation pond due to mining operations. This pond will be replaced by <br />another pond in the revised plan. Detailed plans for the Pyeatt Gulch drain- <br />age and sediment control plan were not included in the original permit appli- <br />cation due to the uncertainty of [he actual mining plan and schedule for this <br />area. Areas in the Pyeatt Gulch drainage will be disturbed by mining opera- <br />tions in 1987 so construction of sediment control structures needs to be com- <br />pleted in 1986. The 1986 and 1987 disturbed areas were submitted as a techni- <br />cal revision in February, 1986. <br />JOHNSON GULCH DRAINAGE AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN <br />A revision to the Johnson Gulch drainage and sediment control plan is neces- <br />sary due to the removal of Johnson Pond lil. Johnson Pond lil will be removed <br />in 1987 to accommodate regrading operations. Johnson Pond lil will be replaced <br />by Johnson Pond lib during 1986. Johnson Pond lib will include enough capacity <br />to compensate for removal of Johnson Dam lil plus the increase in sediment load <br />from the disturbed area in the Johnson watershed over the life of the mine. <br />Johnson Pond lib was previously abandoned because regrading plans called for <br />destruction of this pond. A revised mining and reclamation plan has allowed <br />Johnson lib to remain in place; therefore it is proposed to have Johnson Pond <br />lib replace Johnson Pond lil. The location of Johnson Pond lib is shown on the <br />~ Pyeatt/Johnson Drainage and Sediment Control Plan Map, Map TR-486-1. <br />The proposed Johnson Gulch sedimentation system consists of six sedimentation <br />ponds. The capacity of each pond is shown in Table 1, Johnson and Pyeatt <br />Sedimentation Pond Summary Information. The overall effectiveness of the ser- <br />ies of sedimentation ponds was determined by modeling the surface water hydro- <br />logy of the watershed. Results of the model indicate that during a 10-year, <br />24-hour precipitation event, the peak settleable concentration of sediment in <br />the outflow of the final pond in the series, Johnson Dam /i10, will be 0.0011 <br />ml/1. <br />Input parameters for the hydrologic model, along with complete results, are <br />included in Appendix A, Johnson Gulch Hydrologic Model, Appendix D, Curve <br />Number Determination, and Appendix E, Sedimentology Parameters. <br />Trapper has spent considerable time during the summer of 1986 in discussions <br />with the Division in order to determine the applicable curve numbers and sedi- <br />mentology parameters for design of drainage and sediment control systems. The <br />agreed-upon parameters are shown in Appendix D and Appendix E. Trapper's pre- <br />viously-approved method for designing sediment control structures entailed the <br />use of a single curve number of 70. The new hydrology parameters, while not <br />appreciably altering the field configuration of the Johnson sediment control <br />system, have effected the prediction of peak flow. This increased peak flow <br />is safely passed through the principal and emergency spillways in each pond. <br />The capacities of each spillway are listed in Appendix F, Spillway Discharge <br />1 Revised 8/86 <br />