My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV97244
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV97244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:39 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:07:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/12/2006
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance
From
DMG
To
Seneca Coal Company
Type & Sequence
PR5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
concentrated aspen planting sites). In concentrated aspen planting sites, the <br />density standard will be based on future test plot results and planting strategies <br />based on those results. Jn mesic drainage-wetter phase sites along Dry Creek, and <br />at permanent pond planting sites, the 2000 stem per acre stem density standard <br />will include at least 150 stems per acre as tree species. General location of <br />planting areas is shown on Exhibit 22-1 (former Exhibits 22-1 and 22-1A were <br />combined in PR-5). <br />Various regevetation plan refinements resulted from approval of PR-3 in May 2003. <br />The primary upland seedmix was amended to include mountain big sagebrush, the <br />"shrub only" seedmix (Mix 6) was amended to include a native forb component, and <br />intermediate wheatgrass, an aggressive sod-forming introduced grass was deleted from <br />the stabilization seedmix. The procedures to be employed in the concentrated shrub <br />establishment areas have been modified in several respects to enhance success, including <br />use of elk fencing, use of initial supplemental irrigation, use of combined seedling <br />transplanting and seeding with the native shrub/forb seedmix, and preparation of a very <br />rough seedbed with track-hoe or dozer blade gouges. These modified practices will <br />apply to areas topsoiled and revegetated during or subsequent to 2003. <br />In addition, within PR-3, the operator committed to implement an aspen reestablishment <br />field study that will evaluate the feasibility of aspen reestablishment on reclaimed areas, <br />using sapling transplants obtained from aspen stands on the permit area. The study will <br />include three rates of supplemental irrigation and two soil treatments, as well as a non- <br />irrigated control. The detailed study design is presented in Tab 22, Appendix 22-3. <br />Specific aspen reestablishment approaches to be employed on an operational basis in the <br />future, as well as success standards for aspen will be based on information gained from <br />the study. Certain design and scheduling changes associated with the aspen study were <br />approved by TR-47 in February 2004. Under the revised schedule, planting of the <br />selected aspen saplings was to occur in the fall of 2004. Within TR-47, the operator <br />also committed to limited aspen sapling planting in locations other than the primary field <br />study location. Planting will be in specified locations, using specific planting <br />approaches. In addition, the revision included a commitment to establish aspen sapling <br />"farms", small fenced areas where mature aspen would be mechanically treated to <br />stimulate suckering of saplings for future reclamation use. The aspen study and other <br />aspen plantings have been conducted to date (June 2006) in wnformance with the <br />amended plan and schedule. <br />The applicant has submitted adequate information regarding plant species of threatened <br />or endangered status potentially occurring in the Seneca II-W Mine permit area. During <br />on site inventories conducted in 1983, 1985, 1990 and 1997, no species of special <br />concern were found. The Division of Wildlife and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />were contacted during the PR-2, PR-3, PR-4, and PR-5 reviews, and they did not <br />Seneca II-W Findings Document 58 June 12, 2006 <br />Permit Renewal No. 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.