My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV97244
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV97244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:39 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:07:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/12/2006
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance
From
DMG
To
Seneca Coal Company
Type & Sequence
PR5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in Hubberson Gulch exhibit TSS levels from 5 mg/l to 606 mg/1 with an average of <br />100 mg/1. The total suspended solids increase to Hubberson Gulch that can be <br />attributed to mining is expected to be minimal. Once vegetation is successfully <br />reestablished, the erosion rates are expected to return to the pre-mining level of <br />approximately 140 tons/miZ/yr. <br />Sediment ponds will act to control flood flows from the disturbed area. The ponds <br />will regulate flood discharges, minimizing the impact of the floods. The ponds are <br />not expected to significantly reduce the quantity of runoff water available in Dry <br />Creek. The mine area makes up only a small portion of the Dry Creek watershed <br />(0.9%). <br />The major impact of mining will be the development and subsequent discharge to <br />the surface system of spoils aquifer waters. As each successive pit is reclaimed in <br />the Wadge and Wolf Creek/Sage Creek mining areas, a spoils aquifer will begin to <br />develop. The water necessary to recharge these aquifers will be derived from <br />precipitation, overland flow, and discharge from the Williams Fork formation <br />overburden and the coal seams being mined. <br />The backfilled pits in and of themselves will display unco~ned conditions, <br />however the pits will be surrounded on the sides and be underlain by relatively <br />confining units. The underlying material will be even more confining than the <br />sides. <br />As water enters the reclaimed areas it will tend to migrate through the spoils <br />toward the lowest point in the pit. While some of this water may be lost to the <br />walls, the major portion of it will stay in the pit, as the permeability of this <br />material is greater than that of either the walls or the floor. It is projected that the <br />water quality of spoil aquifers at the Seneca II-W Mine site will approximate that at <br />the nearby Seneca II Mine. The Seneca II Mine spoil aquifers exhibit elevated <br />levels of, total dissolved solids, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, and sulfate. <br />Complete water quality analyses of two spoils aquifer wells are published in the <br />Seneca II Mine 1984 Annual Hydrology Report, Appendix B. <br />As the aquifer is developing, the water will be of slightly poorer quality than the <br />above assumptions, but as the more easily leached constituents are lost, the quality <br />should approximate that at Seneca II Mine. Analysis of spoils water from the <br />Seneca II Mine indicates that this magnesium-calcium sulfate water has elevated <br />levels of sulfate and magnesium. TDS values vary between 2,200 and 4,000 mg/I. <br />Eventually, water at Seneca II-W Mine will begin to discharge to the surface as the <br />water elevation exceeds the ground level or when sufficient head is developed. <br />Seneca II-W Findings Document 47 June 12, 2006 <br />Permi[ Renewal No. 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.