My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV97032
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV97032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:31 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:05:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/13/2004
Doc Name
Seep Issue Response
From
J.E. Stover & Associates
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
SL3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J. E. STOVER & ASSOCIATES <br />2768 COMPASS DRIVE, SUITE 101 <br />GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81506 <br />PHONE: (970) 245-4101, FAX 242-7908 <br />MINE ENGINEERING <br />MINE RECLAMATION <br />September 9, 2004 ~~® <br />S~Q~ RECEI°JED <br />J. J. Dudash <br />Division of Minerals & Geology $EP 1 3 2004 <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, ~i(7 80203 Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Re: Bear Coal Company <br />Seep Issue <br />Permit C-81-033 <br />Dear Mr. Dudash: <br />CIVIL ENGINEERING <br />CONST. MANAGEMENT <br />The DMG's letter dated August 16, 2002 provided comments regarding the Edwards Mine spring. <br />On behalf of Bear Coal Company, Inc., the following additional documentation is provided: <br />1. A plan view of the C-Seam, B-Seam and the slide. <br />2. Hydrologic Monitoring Data for monitoring well AA-1 from 1987 through 1995 which is the <br />period the monitoring well showed much higher than expected conductivity values. <br />3. Hydrologic Monitoring Data for the Edwards Mine spring from December 1997 through <br />December 1998, the period for which laboratory data is available. <br />4. A comparison of the Edwards Mine spring and well AA-1. Selected average quality data <br />of the spring and well AA-1 indicates the water in well AA-1 is very similar to the spring <br />water. It appears the well water is diluted which could be expected. Since the comparison <br />is based on average values from different time periods, the correlation between the spring <br />water and well AA-1 is quite good. <br />5. A comparison of the quality data of water discharged from the Bear No. 3 Mine during 1995 <br />to-the spring water. The water discharged from the mine was tested for parameters <br />dictated by the Department of Health so there are only a few data points to compare. The <br />correlation between the spring water and the mine water is poor. <br />In summary, I believe there is substantial data to support Bear's position that the water emerging <br />from the slide is not mine water. The data supports the view that the spring water existed as early <br />as 1987 when it contaminated well AA-1. <br />Copies of laboratory reports are available upon request. Please call if you have any questions. <br />Sincerely, <br />~~~ <br />J. E. Stover, P.E. <br />Consulting Engineer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.