My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV96883
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV96883
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:25 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:04:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
APPENDIX 3 MINE RECLAMATION STUDY SECOND ANNUAL REPORT
Type & Sequence
TR53
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
drilling the seed rather than the straw mulch. 1978 observations indi- <br />Gated that most of the stzaw blew off the plots early is the 1978 <br />growing season. <br />2. Relative effects of slope angle and mulch treatment on plant <br />growth on aarth and south aspects {Table 3.4-6). <br />As previously discussed, second year density showed a strong re- <br />sponse to aspect. In this analysis, all south aspect treatment means <br />are not significantly different from each other, but all are signifi- <br />cantly lower than north aspect treatments means. Within each mulch <br />treatment (control, excelsior), there are no significant density dif- <br />ferences between different slopes on the same aspect. Density on excel- <br />sior is significantly higher than density on the control on the two <br />north-facing slopes. <br />Cover data show a similar response to aspect. Cover values oa all <br />south aspect treatments are not significantly different from each other <br />but all are significantly lower than nay north aspect treatment. Within <br />each mulch treatment (control, excelsior), control cover oa the 2:1 <br />north slope is signifieaatlg lower than the 4:1 north slope; the excel- <br />sior treatment cover is non-significant between different slopes on the <br />' north aspect. Cover for excelsior-treated plots is higher than foz the <br />control on the 2:1 north slope, but cover differences are non- <br />significant on the 4:1 north slope. <br />Production data follow a pattezn very similar to that described for <br />density and cover. Productivity values on all south aspects were not <br />significantly different from each other, and all were sigaificaatly <br />lower Lhaa on north aspect treatments. The 2:1 north control is <br />sigaificaatly lower than the 4:1 north control, but the two excelsior <br />treatments on different slopes oa the north aspect are non-significant. <br />Production was sigaificaatly higher on excelsior-treated plots than on <br />the control oa both slopes on the north aspect. <br />Jn summary, this analysis shows a strong differential response by <br />test species to aspect. All south-facing treatment means were signifi- <br />cantly lower than north-facing treatment means, regardless of slope and <br />mulch treatment. Significantly higher levels of cover and production <br />were recorded for 4:1 over 2:2 slopes, and excelsior treatments <br />~~ generallq showed significantly higher cover, density, and production <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.