My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV96883
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV96883
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:25 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:04:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
APPENDIX 3 MINE RECLAMATION STUDY SECOND ANNUAL REPORT
Type & Sequence
TR53
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Canopy cover oa 2:1 slopes is significantly higher oa north as <br />compared to south for all treatments; there were no significant dif- <br />•, ferences among mulches within aspects. <br />Production on 2:1 north slopes treatments vas significantly higher <br />than in any south slope treatment, a result consistent with cover and <br />density data. On the south 2:1 slope, the production with hydromulch <br />vas significantly higher than with either the control or excelsior, <br />which were not different £rom each other. This response pattern is <br />consistent with the 1978 results. Oa the north aspect, production under <br />ezcelsior vas significantly greater than Lhat for the control, but was <br />not different from hydromulch. Important differences in response to <br />,mulch are not apparent on this aspect. <br />On 4:1 south slopes, density vas non-significant with respect to <br />mulch treatment; on 4:1 north slopes, densities wader all three mulch <br />treatments were significantly different: straw > control > excelsior. <br />these north slope density data suggest that greater seedling mortality <br />occurred under excelsior than on the relatively unprotected control and <br />stray plots. This observation is based oa the fact that the excelsior <br />•1 treatment contained the largest seedling population when density was <br />~, measured in 1978. It is possible that the excelsior mat fibers soaked <br />up light amounts of precipitation which then evaporated. As a conse- <br />quence, near surface moisture may have been lover under excelsior than <br />other treatments after light shovers. This hypothesis vas also offered <br />to explain low near-surface soil moisture under ezcelsior plots (Sec- <br />tion 3.2.3). With the exception of the excelsior treatment, north slope <br />plots shoved significantly higher densities than south slope plots. <br />Canopy cover vas significantly higher oa north 4:1 slopes than <br />south 4:1 slopes. Cover differences were non-significant across mulches <br />on south slopes; cover wader straw and excelsior were both significantly <br />higher than the control on the north slope. <br />Annual production was significantly higher on north slopes than <br />south slopes. Mulch was non-significant for the south aspect; straw > <br />ezcelsior > control oa the north aspect_ <br />In summary, second year. results suggest that aspect is a more <br />important controlling factor than mulch treatment on 2:1 slopes. This <br />~~ observation is supported by the large differential in planted species <br />~: , <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.